Jun 10, 2026 · 16 min · 9 segments
The best fractional CMOs in the room aren't the ones talking the most. This episode makes the case that silence, in negotiations, in pricing conversations, and especially around how you get your work…
Casey StantonHost
And I was talking to a CMO last week, and they have this deal where they were working with a client, and they had this upside, and the upside was related to some work that they had to do.

They wanted to work with the client, so they cut their base fee down and said, "But when I hit this outcome for you, I wanna be paid for that outcome, and then I want my base fee to increase." And the CEO said, "Great.

Sounds cool." So there they go, and they start moving forward, and they thought they'd hit that target by December, and it was late May when they finally hit it.

Yet the CMO did what they said they would do, which is work at that lower rate, and then they wanna get this upside for achieving that outcome.

One was they told me that they have no formal agreement around any of this stuff, no agreement that their rate should be this, and at a certain point it will become that.

The only thing that was stipulated was if they hit a certain outcome, they would receive a certain capital a- award for that.

So just so much is wrong with that, right? The first thing is, yeah, it's nice that they have that financial incentive, but they should also have written it on a document that says, "When we hit this," and it's photographable, and there's no room for interpretation, "we move forward, and I get paid this." Because at this point, the CEO can just turn around and say, "We never had that conversation, dude.

I've really enjoyed working with you, and I'm fine doing it at the continued cost and capacity, but I'm not gonna pay you more for the work that you've already been doing." That makes sense if they really don't remember it.

And then do they not remember it, or are they being manipulative, right? You have to have that consideration yourself, and you gotta figure out where you land on it.

So to add to that, the next level of this is over the weekend, this CMO was, "I'm thinking before June 1st," when they're supposed to tell me our ongoing agreement and all this stuff, this weird vibe I'm getting from this CMO.

They say, "I'm thinking about just sending the invoice for what they owe me." It's like, "You wanna send an invoice to someone?" And the CEO's on vacation.

"You wanna send an invoice to the CEO while they're on vacation? For what purpose?" To get what you're owed, sure, but could it wait two days or three days before you send the invoice, and can you just wait? And I think the answer is yes, just shut up.

And I was talking to a CMO last week, and they have this deal where they were working with a client, and they had this upside, and the upside was related to some work that they had to do.

They wanted to work with the client, so they cut their base fee down and said, "But when I hit this outcome for you, I wanna be paid for that outcome, and then I want my base fee to increase." And the CEO said, "Great.

Sounds cool." So there they go, and they start moving forward, and they thought they'd hit that target by December, and it was late May when they finally hit it.

Yet the CMO did what they said they would do, which is work at that lower rate, and then they wanna get this upside for achieving that outcome.

One was they told me that they have no formal agreement around any of this stuff, no agreement that their rate should be this, and at a certain point it will become that.

The only thing that was stipulated was if they hit a certain outcome, they would receive a certain capital a- award for that.

So just so much is wrong with that, right? The first thing is, yeah, it's nice that they have that financial incentive, but they should also have written it on a document that says, "When we hit this," and it's photographable, and there's no room for interpretation, "we move forward, and I get paid this." Because at this point, the CEO can just turn around and say, "We never had that conversation, dude.

I've really enjoyed working with you, and I'm fine doing it at the continued cost and capacity, but I'm not gonna pay you more for the work that you've already been doing." That makes sense if they really don't remember it.

And then do they not remember it, or are they being manipulative, right? You have to have that consideration yourself, and you gotta figure out where you land on it.

So to add to that, the next level of this is over the weekend, this CMO was, "I'm thinking before June 1st," when they're supposed to tell me our ongoing agreement and all this stuff, this weird vibe I'm getting from this CMO.

They say, "I'm thinking about just sending the invoice for what they owe me." It's like, "You wanna send an invoice to someone?" And the CEO's on vacation.

"You wanna send an invoice to the CEO while they're on vacation? For what purpose?" To get what you're owed, sure, but could it wait two days or three days before you send the invoice, and can you just wait? And I think the answer is yes, just shut up.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.