Sep 24, 2026 · 29 min · 11 segments
Rob Mac Sweeney discusses the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 2 trial with Prof Jan Bakker, one of the leads for this major international randomised controlled trial investigating peripheral perfusion guided…
Jan BakkerGuest
Rob Mac SweeneyHost
They're basically the three interventions, vasodilation, fluids, and cardiac contractility.

Why did you go with dibutamine, an inodilator rather than an inopressor? Or a different inodilator, like a millinone or something like that?

Well, that's a good question, but the dobutamine did not come from myocardial dysfunction.

In the patients where they had myocardial dysfunction and did some treatment, there was an improvement.

In the Netherlands, we started norepinephrine, glycerin, if you had microcirculatory abnormalities.

When we discussed Andromeda 1, we said, well, hardly any experience with nitroglycerin elsewhere in the world.

I don't think anywhere in the world someone would start the mean arterial pressure of 60.

And we said, what would be a drug that is safe, but has the potential to have the same effect as nitroglycerin? And we decided to use dobutamine, basically based on the studies done in Brussels.

where they looked at the effect of butamine on microcirculatory perfusion, sublingual microcirculatory perfusion, and saw that irrespective of the effect of dobutamine on cardiac output or mediatorial pressure, there was an improvement in microcirculatory perfusion.

No, the heart intervention is way before the dobutamine and the mean arterial pressure challenge because the heart intervention is the immediate start of tier two.

And if you correct the cardiac dysfunction, you still have abnormal capillary refill time.

You had previous hypertension, then you would do the mean arterial pressure test.

They're basically the three interventions, vasodilation, fluids, and cardiac contractility.

Why did you go with dibutamine, an inodilator rather than an inopressor? Or a different inodilator, like a millinone or something like that?

Well, that's a good question, but the dobutamine did not come from myocardial dysfunction.

In the patients where they had myocardial dysfunction and did some treatment, there was an improvement.

In the Netherlands, we started norepinephrine, glycerin, if you had microcirculatory abnormalities.

When we discussed Andromeda 1, we said, well, hardly any experience with nitroglycerin elsewhere in the world.

I don't think anywhere in the world someone would start the mean arterial pressure of 60.

And we said, what would be a drug that is safe, but has the potential to have the same effect as nitroglycerin? And we decided to use dobutamine, basically based on the studies done in Brussels.

where they looked at the effect of butamine on microcirculatory perfusion, sublingual microcirculatory perfusion, and saw that irrespective of the effect of dobutamine on cardiac output or mediatorial pressure, there was an improvement in microcirculatory perfusion.

No, the heart intervention is way before the dobutamine and the mean arterial pressure challenge because the heart intervention is the immediate start of tier two.

And if you correct the cardiac dysfunction, you still have abnormal capillary refill time.

You had previous hypertension, then you would do the mean arterial pressure test.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.