Jun 11, 2026 · 49 min · 6 segments
On May 12, 2026, we produced a 90-minute webinar in which we explored one of the most important and rapidly developing issues in consumer financial services law: coerced debt and the emerging…
Angela LittwinGuest
Alan KaplinskyHost
Divya SubramanianGuest
Naomi YoungGuest
Welcome and thank you for tuning in to today's episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast.

I'm Alan Kaplinsky, the founder and the former chair for 25 years and now senior counsel of the Consumer Financial Services Group at the Ballard Spar Law Firm.

Today's episode is part one of a two-part series featuring a repurposed webinar we presented on May 12th of this year entitled Coerced Debt.

In the first part of this discussion, our speakers explore the background of coerced debt.

They break down the framework of the New York statute and examine how the law impacts creditors and debt collectors.

So today, we're going to be exploring an issue that's gaining significant attention among policymakers, consumer advocates, regulators, and the financial services industry alike.

And in particular, we're going to be focused today, although not right at the beginning of the webinar, on New York's groundbreaking new statute addressing the issue.

At a high level, coerced debt refers to situations in which an individual is forced, manipulated, or deceived into incurring debt without meaningful consent, often in the context of domestic violence, intimate partner abuse, or other forms of financial exploitation.

Historically, the legal system has struggle to provide clear and effective remedies for victims of this type of abuse.

New York has now enacted what I'm referring to as a landmark law, first of its kind in the country, creating a framework for consumers to assert that debts incurred through coercion should not be enforceable.

The statute raises important legal, operational, evidentiary, and policy questions, not only for consumers and advocates, but also for creditors, servicers of debt, debt collectors, debt buyers, and compliance professionals.

New York enacted its coerced debt statute in 1925-1926, and amendments were signed into law in March of this year, delaying the effective date until June 17th of this year.

The amendments purportedly narrowed aspects of the original law and refined creditor obligations.

Similar laws, or I should say similar bills, they're not yet laws, are pending in Vermont and New Jersey.
Read the full transcript.
Create an account to read the whole episode, search across every transcript, and follow the shows you care about.