Jun 12, 2026 · 13 min · 10 segments
Jamie Dimon says yield-bearing stablecoins threaten financial stability and could ""blow up."" But while banks blast crypto in public, JPMorgan is quietly tokenizing yields on blockchain for its own…
Now, on the surface, the objections that banks like JP Morgan have against the Clarity Act sound reasonable enough, and their case rests on one central idea.
If stablecoin issuers can pass treasury yields directly to holders, then depositors will flee the banking system.
And Diamond is not subtle in his opposition.
On Fox Business, he said the bill, quote, allows them to effectively pay interest on deposits, stablecoins or something like that, without protection that they should have.
His framing is simple.
If you want to be a bank, be a bank.
In other words, if a crypto firm takes deposit-like money, then it should face the same capital rules, the same liquidity rules, and the same compliance measures that every bank has to deal with.
And Diamond is not alone here.
The American Bankers Association has run one of the most aggressive lobbying blitzes in years.
On the 13th of April, the ABA published a commissioned study warning that yield-bearing stablecoins could grow the market from roughly $300 billion to $2 trillion, draining bank deposits along the way.
They claimed this could cut local lending significantly, with the Independent Community Bankers of America estimating up to $850 billion in reduced community bank lending capacity.
Then, on the 10th of May, ABA CEO Rob Nichols fired off an emergency letter to every bank CEO in the country demanding, quote, immediate engagement.
Members duly flooded the Senate with more than 8,000 letters.
The official line, in Nickel's own words, was that the proposal would, quote, unnecessarily incentivize the flight of bank deposits into payment stablecoins, putting both economic growth and financial stability at risk.
That is the case they want you to believe.
Deposit flight, broken lending, systemic danger.
It sounds like consumer protection.
The banks all just have our best interests at heart.
So, you might thus assume that a bank this terrified of yield-bearing digital dollars would refuse to touch them.
However, that assumption collapses the second you look at what JP Morgan is actually building behind closed doors.
Now, on the surface, the objections that banks like JP Morgan have against the Clarity Act sound reasonable enough, and their case rests on one central idea.
If stablecoin issuers can pass treasury yields directly to holders, then depositors will flee the banking system.
And Diamond is not subtle in his opposition.
On Fox Business, he said the bill, quote, allows them to effectively pay interest on deposits, stablecoins or something like that, without protection that they should have.
His framing is simple.
If you want to be a bank, be a bank.
In other words, if a crypto firm takes deposit-like money, then it should face the same capital rules, the same liquidity rules, and the same compliance measures that every bank has to deal with.
And Diamond is not alone here.
The American Bankers Association has run one of the most aggressive lobbying blitzes in years.
On the 13th of April, the ABA published a commissioned study warning that yield-bearing stablecoins could grow the market from roughly $300 billion to $2 trillion, draining bank deposits along the way.
They claimed this could cut local lending significantly, with the Independent Community Bankers of America estimating up to $850 billion in reduced community bank lending capacity.
Then, on the 10th of May, ABA CEO Rob Nichols fired off an emergency letter to every bank CEO in the country demanding, quote, immediate engagement.
Members duly flooded the Senate with more than 8,000 letters.
The official line, in Nickel's own words, was that the proposal would, quote, unnecessarily incentivize the flight of bank deposits into payment stablecoins, putting both economic growth and financial stability at risk.
That is the case they want you to believe.
Deposit flight, broken lending, systemic danger.
It sounds like consumer protection.
The banks all just have our best interests at heart.
So, you might thus assume that a bank this terrified of yield-bearing digital dollars would refuse to touch them.
However, that assumption collapses the second you look at what JP Morgan is actually building behind closed doors.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.