Aug 26, 2026 · 14 min · 8 segments
**What if the very first question we ask determines everything that follows?** In this episode of *Mapping What Matters*, host Dr. Katie Blair is joined by social impact practitioner and systems…
Mitra GushehGuest
Katie BlairHost
Now, we've already spoken about asset mapping and how it was an approach as part of asset-based community development in the first episode.

We talked about the fact that as part of asset-based community development, we want to begin with the strengths of community.

So one of the approaches through asset mapping It's about trying to identify those resources within the community, including knowledge, skills, infrastructure, institutions that can then be built on to do community development.

From my perspective, I want to touch on this and talk about what has gone right with asset mapping and what has gone wrong with it and why appreciative inquiry might be the reset we need.

Asset mapping, as it was envisioned as part of asset-based community development, was a bit of a radical act for its time.

It was about identifying and mobilizing community strengths, shifting the gaze from needs and deficits to gifts, skills, relationships, and local leadership.

But as asset mapping has been more widely adopted, it's also become more diluted.

Too often now, it's a task to be ticked off, a tool for generating a product, the map, rather than nurturing a process.

There was a time I was invited to contribute to what was described to me as an asset mapping exercise.

The person who was facilitating that process was calling local services one by one, asking them to describe what they did.

I remember seeing it once in a meeting, and that was the last time I saw it and never again.

They were mapping all the funding sources available to an area around a certain topic.

But really, it was a funding audit, a pre-investment scan to avoid duplication.

Even when community participation is present, we need to ask, are residents leading or are they just supplying data for someone else's plan? That distinction matters.

I've seen initiatives where people were handed a clipboard and asked to go find assets.

Now, we've already spoken about asset mapping and how it was an approach as part of asset-based community development in the first episode.

We talked about the fact that as part of asset-based community development, we want to begin with the strengths of community.

So one of the approaches through asset mapping It's about trying to identify those resources within the community, including knowledge, skills, infrastructure, institutions that can then be built on to do community development.

From my perspective, I want to touch on this and talk about what has gone right with asset mapping and what has gone wrong with it and why appreciative inquiry might be the reset we need.

Asset mapping, as it was envisioned as part of asset-based community development, was a bit of a radical act for its time.

It was about identifying and mobilizing community strengths, shifting the gaze from needs and deficits to gifts, skills, relationships, and local leadership.

But as asset mapping has been more widely adopted, it's also become more diluted.

Too often now, it's a task to be ticked off, a tool for generating a product, the map, rather than nurturing a process.

There was a time I was invited to contribute to what was described to me as an asset mapping exercise.

The person who was facilitating that process was calling local services one by one, asking them to describe what they did.

I remember seeing it once in a meeting, and that was the last time I saw it and never again.

They were mapping all the funding sources available to an area around a certain topic.

But really, it was a funding audit, a pre-investment scan to avoid duplication.

Even when community participation is present, we need to ask, are residents leading or are they just supplying data for someone else's plan? That distinction matters.

I've seen initiatives where people were handed a clipboard and asked to go find assets.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.