Amy DeZernGuest
Blair DeStefanoGuestSummer JohnsonHostWhat language do you use at your institution when you're talking to a patient about their risk profile? At my institution

and others, we classify MDS as either being lower risk or higher risk in broad terms, using the IPSSR cutoff value of three and a half to delineate the two.

More recently, after several years, I think everyone is finally catching on to the new ICC classification and we're actually describing MDS properly.

How about you, Dr. DeZern? Are you guys super technical with using the proper classification or are you more broad, like lower risk versus higher risk?

You know, to be honest, I think it's challenging and I really try and individualize it to a patient and their family because I do worry that sometimes the terminology lower risk may not correctly convey the impact the disease is going to have on an individual human's life.

And I don't want to over reassure, but I also don't want to get so technical that they don't understand at all.

And I try to start with the depth of cytopenia and then take it all the way through the bone marrow biopsy report when we're going through the diagnostics to give them biologic context of why I might say this is going to behave in a more indolent fashion or this may behave much more like AML.

Because quite commonly, I suspect you have patients that do this as well, they've read on the internet that perhaps a survival or a timeline for their life that may not accurately depict what's really going on in them as an MDS patient.
So Dr. DeZern, are you trying to stay away from the low and the high risk when you talk to patients?

And so they usually come with that knowledge and they want, honestly, an understandable amount of reassurance that they're not high risk.

Or I think this is disease that is less likely to need intervention anytime soon.
What language do you use at your institution when you're talking to a patient about their risk profile? At my institution

and others, we classify MDS as either being lower risk or higher risk in broad terms, using the IPSSR cutoff value of three and a half to delineate the two.

More recently, after several years, I think everyone is finally catching on to the new ICC classification and we're actually describing MDS properly.

How about you, Dr. DeZern? Are you guys super technical with using the proper classification or are you more broad, like lower risk versus higher risk?

You know, to be honest, I think it's challenging and I really try and individualize it to a patient and their family because I do worry that sometimes the terminology lower risk may not correctly convey the impact the disease is going to have on an individual human's life.

And I don't want to over reassure, but I also don't want to get so technical that they don't understand at all.

And I try to start with the depth of cytopenia and then take it all the way through the bone marrow biopsy report when we're going through the diagnostics to give them biologic context of why I might say this is going to behave in a more indolent fashion or this may behave much more like AML.

Because quite commonly, I suspect you have patients that do this as well, they've read on the internet that perhaps a survival or a timeline for their life that may not accurately depict what's really going on in them as an MDS patient.
So Dr. DeZern, are you trying to stay away from the low and the high risk when you talk to patients?

And so they usually come with that knowledge and they want, honestly, an understandable amount of reassurance that they're not high risk.

Or I think this is disease that is less likely to need intervention anytime soon.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.