Oct 5, 2026 · 1 hr 8 min · 15 segments
Joshua Knobe is a Yale professor and experimental philosopher whose research explores identity, morality, human behaviour and the way we decide what makes someone their “true self.” In this…
Joshua KnobeGuestThere's a lot of Venn diagrams in my head.
So...
What do you think is the underlying driver in this behavior or projection? I guess.
Have you been able to, to, to, to figure that out?

But one thing we find that's really striking about this is that it doesn't seem to be something that only arises in the way people think about other human beings.

It seems like just across the board, people have a tendency to think about everything, that whatever is the good part of it is the true essence of it.

And then suppose the scientific paper includes some parts that are really good, like there's some parts of it that are really breaking important new ground in science, and then some parts of it that are just totally mediocre and really aren't helping at all.

And people are thinking, well, what's really the essence of this paper? What is it really all about? Then people tend to choose the good parts.


How did you get into this work? How did I get into it?

It's a little bit, it's going to be a silly answer, but I'm just going to tell you the truth about how we got into it.

So we started thinking about it because we were thinking about reactions to douchey boyfriends.
Reactions to douchey boyfriends.

That we were just thinking about women we knew who were dating these people who were just total douchebags.
There's a lot of Venn diagrams in my head.
So...
What do you think is the underlying driver in this behavior or projection? I guess.
Have you been able to, to, to, to figure that out?

But one thing we find that's really striking about this is that it doesn't seem to be something that only arises in the way people think about other human beings.

It seems like just across the board, people have a tendency to think about everything, that whatever is the good part of it is the true essence of it.

And then suppose the scientific paper includes some parts that are really good, like there's some parts of it that are really breaking important new ground in science, and then some parts of it that are just totally mediocre and really aren't helping at all.

And people are thinking, well, what's really the essence of this paper? What is it really all about? Then people tend to choose the good parts.


How did you get into this work? How did I get into it?

It's a little bit, it's going to be a silly answer, but I'm just going to tell you the truth about how we got into it.

So we started thinking about it because we were thinking about reactions to douchey boyfriends.
Reactions to douchey boyfriends.

That we were just thinking about women we knew who were dating these people who were just total douchebags.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.