Oct 24, 2026 · 26 min · 29 segments
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This is a picture of a black hole from the Event Horizon Telescope from NASA, captured from a galaxy called M87, 55 million light years away from Earth.
A black hole occurs when a star exhausts most of its nuclear fuel and collapses under its own gravitational pull.
If it's a large enough star, its compactification results in a gravitational pull so strong that nothing can escape, not even light.
In 1976, legendary physicist Stephen Hawking proposed that black holes, mysterious enough as they are, do something that should be impossible according to the laws of quantum mechanics.
Information should be conserved in the universe, because if it's not, then it could mean that causality could be violated.
In other words, random inexplicable events could happen that are not linked to prior events.
The order of events, time, and the deterministic laws we think we know could all be garbage.
What is the black hole information paradox? How are causality and information conservation correlated? And how do black holes potentially violate it? That's coming up right now.
The first question you might have is, what does information have to do with black holes? I'll explain that first.
They describe information as the number of yes-no questions that must be answered to fully specify the properties of a system.
By the way, this definition of information is also the way entropy is defined in physics.
The more information that is necessary to specify a system, the higher the entropy of the system.
In terms of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy can never decrease.
So this also has implications for information because if information could be erased, then that would mean that entropy could be decreased.
This is a picture of a black hole from the Event Horizon Telescope from NASA, captured from a galaxy called M87, 55 million light years away from Earth.
A black hole occurs when a star exhausts most of its nuclear fuel and collapses under its own gravitational pull.
If it's a large enough star, its compactification results in a gravitational pull so strong that nothing can escape, not even light.
In 1976, legendary physicist Stephen Hawking proposed that black holes, mysterious enough as they are, do something that should be impossible according to the laws of quantum mechanics.
Information should be conserved in the universe, because if it's not, then it could mean that causality could be violated.
In other words, random inexplicable events could happen that are not linked to prior events.
The order of events, time, and the deterministic laws we think we know could all be garbage.
What is the black hole information paradox? How are causality and information conservation correlated? And how do black holes potentially violate it? That's coming up right now.
The first question you might have is, what does information have to do with black holes? I'll explain that first.
They describe information as the number of yes-no questions that must be answered to fully specify the properties of a system.
By the way, this definition of information is also the way entropy is defined in physics.
The more information that is necessary to specify a system, the higher the entropy of the system.
In terms of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy can never decrease.
So this also has implications for information because if information could be erased, then that would mean that entropy could be decreased.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.