Can you comment on that?

Yeah, absolutely.

And- and, you know, New York State and- and perhaps part of the reason she chose to file in- in the New York State Court is because they are quite deferential to, uh, parties that- that bring cases that involve allegations of this nature.

So there is an opportunity to challenge that status, and we do have a return date for the parties to oppose her request to appear by pseudonym.

Um, but I think that the courts are likely to allow her to remain that status because of, again, the nature of the allegations and that courts typically do allow parties to- to proceed as- as a Doe.

Um, on the other side, you know, oftentimes we talk about is it appropriate to name the defendants, right? I mean, if we're bringing a lawsuit on the plaintiff's side, which we often do, do we name the other parties? And at this point, y- there have been some discussions about do we move to keep that pseudonym status or try to, uh, remove it.

And- and from our perspective, it- it- it doesn't matter at this point.

What do they need to know about Giglio that they don't know?