at clifford and estate.

So our methodological verluven dilutes the importance and centrality of our core preference.

So we can't live at all.

Because it's very easy to slip into seeing our prime and function as excerpts in the design and execution of the rage of methods.

We're just, we're just for hire on anything go and lose sight of the thing that gears us and holds and unifies us, which is understanding and developing the values.

our coherence is a value of the question you said ask about merit importance and work and of course how we answer those questions must be contextual and is therefore plural however When we treat our methods and our approaches as a buffet, and believe you me, they are a buffet, that defines us, this risks diluting our equity, resulting in very poor quality evaluation and reputational damage to our position.

If there is no boundary around how the methods and approaches can be employed in evaluation, then EWOD can call itself an evaluator and our initial set

will be weakened.