Skip to main content

John Sykema

John Sikkema, Director of Law and Policy at ARPA Canada, constitutional lawyer who has argued cases at the Supreme Court of Canada including the Wall Jehovah's Witnesses privacy case.

Oct 12, 2026

3:49
55, thank you.
3:50
Thank you, Chief Justice.

2 HRS 20 MINS LATER

143:24
John Tsukima.
143:29
Chief Justices, I have two points.
143:33
First, excluding records created solely for religious purposes from PIPA would not undermine a free and democratic society.
143:41
Second, subjecting such records to PIPA does threaten a free and democratic society.
143:46
So first, the respondents rightly note that statutes like PIPA are called quasi-constitutional because of the role privacy plays in preserving a free and democratic society.
143:55
And of course, they cite this court in Local 401 at paragraphs 19 to 22.
3:50
you.
3:50
Thank you, Chief Justice.

2 HRS 20 MINS LATER

143:25
John Tsukima.
143:30
Chief Justices, I have two points.
143:33
First, excluding records created solely for religious purposes from PIPA would not undermine a free and democratic society.
143:42
Second, subjecting such records to PIPA does threaten a free and democratic society.
143:47
So first, the respondents rightly note that statutes like PIPA are called quasi-constitutional because of the role privacy plays in preserving a free and democratic society.
143:56
And of course, they cite this court in Local 401 at paragraphs 19 to 22.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.