issue of minimal

impairment because before that one describing the legislative purpose and objective behind section three and pip as a whole because they're definitely connected she properly points to this court's decision local 401 which indicated that The objective behind these provisions is to provide not absolute control and access to your personal information, but a measure of control, qualified, quite relative.

And I would insist on quite relative when you consider Section 3 and so forth under PIPA.

So measure of control, but then when she considered minimal impairment, she appears to have forgotten or left behind that limited purpose measure of control, measure of access, because then she...

Her conclusion in paragraph 120 of the order is essentially to say, well, to accommodate these types of religious rights, which are fundamental, and she says it's non-trivial infringement, even me seeing this as an adjudicator, but to accommodate this, to quote the adjudicators, it would completely undermine and defeat that purpose.

That purpose.

But she doesn't explain...

Reply.

issue of

minimal impairment.

Because before that one describing the legislative purpose and objective behind Section 3 and PIP as a whole, because they're definitely connected, she properly points to this court's decision, Local 401, which indicated that The objective behind these provisions is to provide not absolute control and access to your personal information, but a measure of control, qualified, quite relative.

And I would insist on quite relative when you consider Section 3 and so forth under PIPA.

So measure of control.

But then when she considered minimal impairment, she appears to have forgotten or left behind that limited purpose of measure of control, measure of access, because then she...

Her conclusion in paragraph 120 of the order is essentially to say, well, to accommodate these types of religious rights, which are fundamental, and she says it's non-trivial infringement, even me seeing this as an adjudicator, but to accommodate this, to quote the adjudicators, it would completely undermine and defeat that purpose.

Reply.