Why it is that state liability would be so injurious to the government's interests in that context, which is, I thought, the context that we're concerned about in this very case.

That's right.

And obviously, we want our contractors to obey their contracts.

We want them to obey military orders.

But that doesn't mean that we aren't threatened by the imposition of the specter of tort regulation in the relationship between the military and its contractors, whether or not the contract has been complied with.

As has already been mentioned, that that's first of all going to lead to disputes about whether it's been complied with, that are going to be adjudicated half a world away, maybe with a government in an empty chair.

But even when The state thinks it is trying to help the federal government enforce its own standards.

on a