Jonathan WeigelGuest
Anders JensenGuestTim PhillipsHost
We focus on pretty nitty gritty organizational details and operations within the tax authority.

So we refer to this as kind of the sinews of state power, like how the tax department is organized.

Is it hierarchical? Is it highly specialized? How do they manage personnel? How do they recruit them? How do they promote them? What kind of incentives do they use to get people to exert the kind of effort that they want? How do they form teams? And finally, things like task management.

So how much discretion do you allow or how much do you rely on protocols that try to systematize the way that the members of the bureaucracy function? So these types of really nitty gritty details about how the basic work of the tax authority is conducted.
But I note that a lot of the focus recently has been on getting better data for the tax authorities.
No taxation without information, I think was the title of Tina Pomerantz's paper from a few years ago.
Why has there been this focus on data, especially administrative data? Why has that been seen as important?

The deep idea here that Dina's paper was so instrumental in shedding light on is that governments really need to be able to observe transactions and activities in the economy in order to effectively tax them.


What data leverages is the fact that someone else apart from the taxpayer is engaged in that activity.

So employers, financial institutions, and more and more large online retailers are these third parties that essentially observe the value of that same transaction that the taxpayer is reporting to the tax authority.

And so by tapping into this third-party data, governments can, in principle, much more effectively ensure that taxpayers are accurately reporting the value of their activities and therefore paying the correct amount in taxes that they're supposed to.

So Dina's paper focuses on the value-added tax, where the third party is essentially the other firm that engages in that business-to-business transaction.

And there's another influential paper by Henrik Kleven and Qualters that focus on the personal income tax, where the third party would be the employer.

When a transaction is covered by third-party data, compliance with tax payments just dramatically improves.

And so in the absence of third party data, to put it a little bit crudely, it's kind of like my word against yours.

And the tax authority could, in principle, uncover the true value of activities, but it would just have to spend substantial resources to do that.

So this is really the way in which data can just be so crucial for the effective compliance with tax liabilities.

That's a great question, Tim, and that's what a lot of more recent work has also tried to shed light on.

So taken together, this more recent body of work points to several limitations to information.

We focus on pretty nitty gritty organizational details and operations within the tax authority.

So we refer to this as kind of the sinews of state power, like how the tax department is organized.

Is it hierarchical? Is it highly specialized? How do they manage personnel? How do they recruit them? How do they promote them? What kind of incentives do they use to get people to exert the kind of effort that they want? How do they form teams? And finally, things like task management.

So how much discretion do you allow or how much do you rely on protocols that try to systematize the way that the members of the bureaucracy function? So these types of really nitty gritty details about how the basic work of the tax authority is conducted.
But I note that a lot of the focus recently has been on getting better data for the tax authorities.
No taxation without information, I think was the title of Tina Pomerantz's paper from a few years ago.
Why has there been this focus on data, especially administrative data? Why has that been seen as important?

The deep idea here that Dina's paper was so instrumental in shedding light on is that governments really need to be able to observe transactions and activities in the economy in order to effectively tax them.


What data leverages is the fact that someone else apart from the taxpayer is engaged in that activity.

So employers, financial institutions, and more and more large online retailers are these third parties that essentially observe the value of that same transaction that the taxpayer is reporting to the tax authority.

And so by tapping into this third-party data, governments can, in principle, much more effectively ensure that taxpayers are accurately reporting the value of their activities and therefore paying the correct amount in taxes that they're supposed to.

So Dina's paper focuses on the value-added tax, where the third party is essentially the other firm that engages in that business-to-business transaction.

And there's another influential paper by Henrik Kleven and Qualters that focus on the personal income tax, where the third party would be the employer.

When a transaction is covered by third-party data, compliance with tax payments just dramatically improves.

And so in the absence of third party data, to put it a little bit crudely, it's kind of like my word against yours.

And the tax authority could, in principle, uncover the true value of activities, but it would just have to spend substantial resources to do that.

So this is really the way in which data can just be so crucial for the effective compliance with tax liabilities.

That's a great question, Tim, and that's what a lot of more recent work has also tried to shed light on.

So taken together, this more recent body of work points to several limitations to information.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.