Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast
Sep 25, 2026 · 25 min · 11 segments
The Lindsay Clancy mistrial is facing new scrutiny as jurors reveal what happened behind closed doors with the lone holdout. New information is also surfacing about the juror’s past as questions mount…
Vinny PolitanHost
So let's talk about what is happening in the Lindsay Clancy case, the aftermath of all of this.
Lindsay Clancy was one juror away from being found, not criminally responsible for killing her three children, which she admittedly did.
Some of the jurors have come out publicly and started to talk about deliberations and what happened inside of that jury room.
Kevin Reddington has been talking about the holdout, has sort of pointed his finger at the holdout as some sort of a rogue type of juror, which is interesting, right? It's rare that the defense points the finger at a holdout and saying this is something that should not have happened.
Because it was just one man who voted and continued to vote Lindsay Clancy guilty or not going along with the other 11 to find her not criminally responsible.
You know, who is he? What's the background like? And local news has taken a look at this and we want to take a look at it.
And for a couple of reasons and put some perspective and analysis into all of it.
But first of all, it was the folks over at NBC 10 in Boston who did this investigation.
And basically the headline, domestic violence allegations raise questions about the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial.
First of all, I'm going to start, I've never really seen an investigation of a juror before like this.
Like jurors have come forward and they've been interviewed and we find out about them.
But I've never seen a case where we're investigating a juror after a verdict or a non-verdict after deliberations.
And it's the one holdout, which is interesting that we're investigating the holdout to see what their background's like.
But how about an investigation of the 11 who voted the other way? If you're going to investigate the jury, why just the holdout as if they did something wrong? Why not investigate all 12 to find out their backgrounds as well? But that wasn't done here.
But it is some interesting information, eye-opening information, as a matter of fact.
So let's talk about what is happening in the Lindsay Clancy case, the aftermath of all of this.
Lindsay Clancy was one juror away from being found, not criminally responsible for killing her three children, which she admittedly did.
Some of the jurors have come out publicly and started to talk about deliberations and what happened inside of that jury room.
Kevin Reddington has been talking about the holdout, has sort of pointed his finger at the holdout as some sort of a rogue type of juror, which is interesting, right? It's rare that the defense points the finger at a holdout and saying this is something that should not have happened.
Because it was just one man who voted and continued to vote Lindsay Clancy guilty or not going along with the other 11 to find her not criminally responsible.
You know, who is he? What's the background like? And local news has taken a look at this and we want to take a look at it.
And for a couple of reasons and put some perspective and analysis into all of it.
But first of all, it was the folks over at NBC 10 in Boston who did this investigation.
And basically the headline, domestic violence allegations raise questions about the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial.
First of all, I'm going to start, I've never really seen an investigation of a juror before like this.
Like jurors have come forward and they've been interviewed and we find out about them.
But I've never seen a case where we're investigating a juror after a verdict or a non-verdict after deliberations.
And it's the one holdout, which is interesting that we're investigating the holdout to see what their background's like.
But how about an investigation of the 11 who voted the other way? If you're going to investigate the jury, why just the holdout as if they did something wrong? Why not investigate all 12 to find out their backgrounds as well? But that wasn't done here.
But it is some interesting information, eye-opening information, as a matter of fact.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
