Vinnie Politan Investigates Podcast
Sep 16, 2026 · 48 min · 13 segments
The jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial has begun deliberating, but so far, they have not reached a unanimous verdict. As jurors weigh the evidence, Vinnie Politan breaks down the most dramatic…
Vinnie PolitanHost
Sierra GillespieGuest
Joseph Krowski Jr.Guest
So on day four of deliberations, and kind of like what I outlined here in my formula, four days, finally, finally, We hear something from this jury, and it was a significant day because finally they're sending out a note saying, listen, here we are.

It was over 17 hours or so of deliberations when they sent out that note and spoke today about their – reaching or attempting to reach a verdict.

But when you go on social media, what's interesting about the divide is that it's very dug in.

People are fighting over their beliefs and what they believe should be done with this woman who admittedly killed her children.

It's not about, did she do it? It's not about this piece of evidence versus that piece of evidence.

It's about what people believe, and that's what people are talking about on social media, and that's what's divided the nation here.

And the question is, is it for the same reason? Is this jury divided, unable to reach a unanimous verdict, Because they just see this differently.

Like, what should be done with someone like Lindsay Clancy, who's a mentally ill killer? She killed her children.

The only question is, should she be held criminally responsible for it? And there's no magic formula for that.

You know, the experts on both sides looked at this case and had similar analysis, at least two out of the three for the prosecution.

The jury went home early yesterday, came back today, and within an hour or so sent a note to the judge.

So on day four of deliberations, and kind of like what I outlined here in my formula, four days, finally, finally, We hear something from this jury, and it was a significant day because finally they're sending out a note saying, listen, here we are.

It was over 17 hours or so of deliberations when they sent out that note and spoke today about their – reaching or attempting to reach a verdict.

But when you go on social media, what's interesting about the divide is that it's very dug in.

People are fighting over their beliefs and what they believe should be done with this woman who admittedly killed her children.

It's not about, did she do it? It's not about this piece of evidence versus that piece of evidence.

It's about what people believe, and that's what people are talking about on social media, and that's what's divided the nation here.

And the question is, is it for the same reason? Is this jury divided, unable to reach a unanimous verdict, Because they just see this differently.

Like, what should be done with someone like Lindsay Clancy, who's a mentally ill killer? She killed her children.

The only question is, should she be held criminally responsible for it? And there's no magic formula for that.

You know, the experts on both sides looked at this case and had similar analysis, at least two out of the three for the prosecution.

The jury went home early yesterday, came back today, and within an hour or so sent a note to the judge.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.