Sep 16, 2026 · 47 min · 10 segments
Berenberg's chief economist breaks down why Europe keeps missing growth — and the reforms that could close the gap. **GUEST** **Dr. Holger Schmieding** Chief Economist, Berenberg Bank; Repeatedly…
Martin KaebleHostMichaelHost
So you mentioned regulation, of course, you mentioned productivity growth, which is connected.
It is a serious factor, yes, but I think the other factors that we mentioned already are more important.
It already was actually there when we were not underperforming the US by such a wide margin.
We see that in roughly 20% of Eurozone chemicals output having migrated abroad.
Chemicals is typically very energy intensive, and some of that has gone to the US.


How would you consider that one, if you would rank it with the others? It's probably
a bit above energy costs, but quite a bit below all the things we mentioned about regulations and capital markets union.
When the U.S. was open to immigration until Trump returned to office, the U.S. did have an advantage here.
But now that the U.S. has gone to net immigration of zero, possibly even negative, with more people leaving the U.S. than coming into the U.S., the U.S. actually is starting to fall behind Europe on immigration.
Their birth rate is still a bit higher than the European average, but Europe remains somewhat open to qualified, especially, immigration, and that the U.S., now with tariffs, And with your heart clamped down on immigration, that the U.S. is wasting some of its previous advantages over Europe is one reason why I think that the U.S.-European growth gap will narrow.

And would you say there will be a structural change then over the coming years? Or is this something very, you know, caused in most recent developments, which can quickly again twist and turn in other directions?

So you mentioned regulation, of course, you mentioned productivity growth, which is connected.
It is a serious factor, yes, but I think the other factors that we mentioned already are more important.
It already was actually there when we were not underperforming the US by such a wide margin.
We see that in roughly 20% of Eurozone chemicals output having migrated abroad.
Chemicals is typically very energy intensive, and some of that has gone to the US.


How would you consider that one, if you would rank it with the others? It's probably
a bit above energy costs, but quite a bit below all the things we mentioned about regulations and capital markets union.
When the U.S. was open to immigration until Trump returned to office, the U.S. did have an advantage here.
But now that the U.S. has gone to net immigration of zero, possibly even negative, with more people leaving the U.S. than coming into the U.S., the U.S. actually is starting to fall behind Europe on immigration.
Their birth rate is still a bit higher than the European average, but Europe remains somewhat open to qualified, especially, immigration, and that the U.S., now with tariffs, And with your heart clamped down on immigration, that the U.S. is wasting some of its previous advantages over Europe is one reason why I think that the U.S.-European growth gap will narrow.

And would you say there will be a structural change then over the coming years? Or is this something very, you know, caused in most recent developments, which can quickly again twist and turn in other directions?
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.