Aug 24, 2026 · 41 min · 9 segments
North Korea is no longer the country the international community was dealing with two decades ago. Its nuclear capabilities continue to develop, its relationship with Russia has deepened, and…
Michael MacArthur BosackGuestIan Fleming ZhouHostI have to parse that into two separate issues because they're both very big issues.
The first one being the recent overtures from the Trump White House to the DPRK, and the second one being interpretations of DPRK activity.
So I'll start with the Trump White House overtures because that is a recent development.
It's something that we're still trying to understand as far as how far along are they? Has there actually been engagement between Washington and Pyongyang on anything.
I think the key thing for your listeners to remember here is that the Trump administration has been trying to reach out to the DPRK to rekindle some sort of face-to-face contact between President Trump and Kim Jong-un since 2008.
There's been correspondences via the New York channel that have gone unanswered from the DPRK.
So there's been no shortage of attempts from the White House to try to rekindle some sort of contact.
It's really what you mentioned, which was the concession that was offered to it.
Whereas maybe the Trump White House wouldn't look at it as a concession.
The idea that you would reduce... an exercise to try to create space for diplomacy is interesting.
It's something he tried after the Singapore summit in June 2018, and he's trying it again here.
The key to understand from the DPRK side is that they haven't wanted to engage with the Trump White House for any number of reasons.
But the primary one being that until denuclearization is dropped as a policy objective, they don't want to engage.
And so that's a precondition to negotiations they've been very clear about.
And so the question for the White House is, is that something that the White House is willing to drop at this point? We can talk about that a little bit more if you want to going forward.
Now, talking about the interpretations of DPRK actions, and particularly with exercise, I'll just point out that combined exercise is not something that the Kim Jong-un regime really cares about all that much anymore.
When they launch missiles around the exercises, part of that is because it's a good time of year to launch missiles when you need to do testing.
To me, in having worked at the United Nations Command Military Armistice Commission for almost seven years and gone through countless exercises, sometimes the DPRK complains about them, sometimes it doesn't, but it understands that the exercises are not staging for an invasion.
I have to parse that into two separate issues because they're both very big issues.
The first one being the recent overtures from the Trump White House to the DPRK, and the second one being interpretations of DPRK activity.
So I'll start with the Trump White House overtures because that is a recent development.
It's something that we're still trying to understand as far as how far along are they? Has there actually been engagement between Washington and Pyongyang on anything.
I think the key thing for your listeners to remember here is that the Trump administration has been trying to reach out to the DPRK to rekindle some sort of face-to-face contact between President Trump and Kim Jong-un since 2008.
There's been correspondences via the New York channel that have gone unanswered from the DPRK.
So there's been no shortage of attempts from the White House to try to rekindle some sort of contact.
It's really what you mentioned, which was the concession that was offered to it.
Whereas maybe the Trump White House wouldn't look at it as a concession.
The idea that you would reduce... an exercise to try to create space for diplomacy is interesting.
It's something he tried after the Singapore summit in June 2018, and he's trying it again here.
The key to understand from the DPRK side is that they haven't wanted to engage with the Trump White House for any number of reasons.
But the primary one being that until denuclearization is dropped as a policy objective, they don't want to engage.
And so that's a precondition to negotiations they've been very clear about.
And so the question for the White House is, is that something that the White House is willing to drop at this point? We can talk about that a little bit more if you want to going forward.
Now, talking about the interpretations of DPRK actions, and particularly with exercise, I'll just point out that combined exercise is not something that the Kim Jong-un regime really cares about all that much anymore.
When they launch missiles around the exercises, part of that is because it's a good time of year to launch missiles when you need to do testing.
To me, in having worked at the United Nations Command Military Armistice Commission for almost seven years and gone through countless exercises, sometimes the DPRK complains about them, sometimes it doesn't, but it understands that the exercises are not staging for an invasion.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
