So Carson.
I read the whole thing probably four times on the plane, which definitely makes me sound diligent, but that is just not the case.
It's just that you can read it four times in like a minute because there's nothing in it.
The company physician saw him first and only put together, what, two pages? And the line everyone's going to end up quoting is that Carson is unable to sustain a narrative thread, which is not really a finding.
It makes me wonder if they really tried at all or if they just took one look at this guy and gave up.
But interestingly, corporate security had him for six hours, so they were definitely not giving up.
Six hours.
And I read that transcript twice on the second lay because I couldn't work out what I was annoyed about.
But eventually, after I got through it, I figured out they're not really assessing him at all.
The security team is looking for something.
Every third question comes back around to the cargo bay.
What did you see in there? What was in the container? What did you see? What did you see? What did you see? And he's giving them these pieces about a room that nobody's brought up.
And then they just reset and then they go back through again.
Six hours of that and absolutely nobody offers the guy a glass of water.
You can see it in the timestamps.
They don't stop.
There's no break anywhere in it.
Which, look, it's not my business.
And I'm not putting it in the file.
But, you know, I'm sitting in a rented room talking to myself.
So whatever's in that hold, somebody wanted it a great deal more than they wanted him.
Anyway, the question I'm actually here for is accident negligence or malicious intent.
That's the whole job.
Five people are dead.
There's a total hall loss.
So Carson.
I read the whole thing probably four times on the plane, which definitely makes me sound diligent, but that is just not the case.
It's just that you can read it four times in like a minute because there's nothing in it.
The company physician saw him first and only put together, what, two pages? And the line everyone's going to end up quoting is that Carson is unable to sustain a narrative thread, which is not really a finding.
It makes me wonder if they really tried at all or if they just took one look at this guy and gave up.
But interestingly, corporate security had him for six hours, so they were definitely not giving up.
Six hours.
And I read that transcript twice on the second lay because I couldn't work out what I was annoyed about.
But eventually, after I got through it, I figured out they're not really assessing him at all.
The security team is looking for something.
Every third question comes back around to the cargo bay.
What did you see in there? What was in the container? What did you see? What did you see? What did you see? And he's giving them these pieces about a room that nobody's brought up.
And then they just reset and then they go back through again.
Six hours of that and absolutely nobody offers the guy a glass of water.
You can see it in the timestamps.
They don't stop.
There's no break anywhere in it.
Which, look, it's not my business.
And I'm not putting it in the file.
But, you know, I'm sitting in a rented room talking to myself.
So whatever's in that hold, somebody wanted it a great deal more than they wanted him.
Anyway, the question I'm actually here for is accident negligence or malicious intent.
That's the whole job.
Five people are dead.
There's a total hall loss.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.