And the truth is, it's an interesting pasuk, because by the oni in Mitzrayim, it doesn't say the Rabbeinu Shalom heard our cries, even though the pasuk says that Klal Yisrael cried out to the Rabbeinu Shalom, v'tal shavasam aleichem min ha'avdah.
The pasuk says the Rabbeinu Shalom saw Bnei Yisrael, v'yeida aleichem.
The Rabbeinu Shalom knew.
That's what it says in Parashat Shemaes.
So it's interesting that the tefilah in Mitzrayim generated a response from HaKadosh Baruch Hu in Vayar aleichem ez Bnei Yisrael.
The Rabbeinu Shalom saw.
The pasuk says, V'yitzak u'Bnei Yisrael Hashem.
It's interesting that specifically by Mitzrayim, we don't discuss the fact that the Rabbeinu Shalom heard the tefilas, but rather the Rabbeinu Shalom saw the pain.
And possibly the difference is because in Mitzrayim, the Rabbeinu Shalom was going to be paid to us anyway.
Therefore, when Klal Yisrael davened immediately, v'teires ani avi seinvim Mitzrayim, the Rabbeinu Shalom immediately saw and responded like we explained.
Chazal say the reason why the Rabbeinu Shalom put them in the situation by the yam suf is because he wanted to hear their voice, Hashmeini ez keilech, Chazal darshin.
And therefore, that's perhaps the emphasis of why it says by the yam suf that the Rabbeinu Shalom heard the cries.
Both of them brought the Yeshua.
The Rabbeinu Shalom wanted to hear Klal Yisrael's cries.
As opposed to in Mitzrayim, the Rabbeinu Shalom was going to redeem us anyway, but the cries generated a response from HaKadosh Baruch Hu, and therefore the term is like it says in the pasuk in Shemaes, that the Rabbeinu Shalom saw what we were experiencing.
The message for an avodah sh'balev perspective when it comes to tefilas for a person to realize that his tefilas make an impact.
And the truth is, it's an interesting pasuk, because by the oni in Mitzrayim, it doesn't say the Rabbeinu Shalom heard our cries, even though the pasuk says that Klal Yisrael cried out to the Rabbeinu Shalom, v'tal shavasam aleichem min ha'avdah.
The pasuk says the Rabbeinu Shalom saw Bnei Yisrael, v'yeida aleichem.
The Rabbeinu Shalom knew.
That's what it says in Parashat Shemaes.
So it's interesting that the tefilah in Mitzrayim generated a response from HaKadosh Baruch Hu in Vayar aleichem ez Bnei Yisrael.
The Rabbeinu Shalom saw.
The pasuk says, V'yitzak u'Bnei Yisrael Hashem.
It's interesting that specifically by Mitzrayim, we don't discuss the fact that the Rabbeinu Shalom heard the tefilas, but rather the Rabbeinu Shalom saw the pain.
And possibly the difference is because in Mitzrayim, the Rabbeinu Shalom was going to be paid to us anyway.
Therefore, when Klal Yisrael davened immediately, v'teires ani avi seinvim Mitzrayim, the Rabbeinu Shalom immediately saw and responded like we explained.
Chazal say the reason why the Rabbeinu Shalom put them in the situation by the yam suf is because he wanted to hear their voice, Hashmeini ez keilech, Chazal darshin.
And therefore, that's perhaps the emphasis of why it says by the yam suf that the Rabbeinu Shalom heard the cries.
Both of them brought the Yeshua.
The Rabbeinu Shalom wanted to hear Klal Yisrael's cries.
As opposed to in Mitzrayim, the Rabbeinu Shalom was going to redeem us anyway, but the cries generated a response from HaKadosh Baruch Hu, and therefore the term is like it says in the pasuk in Shemaes, that the Rabbeinu Shalom saw what we were experiencing.
The message for an avodah sh'balev perspective when it comes to tefilas for a person to realize that his tefilas make an impact.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.