Lindsay Clancy Trial: A Forensic Psychiatrist Explains Psychosis, Malingering, & the Insanity Defense

Lindsay Clancy postpartum psychosis and the insanity defense are examined through a forensic psychiatry lens in this episode. We discuss how psychiatrists distinguish psychosis from malingering, whether someone can be psychotic while still appearing organized, command hallucinations, delusions, altruistic filicide, and what criminal responsibility actually asks. We also look at Dr. Philip Resnick’s testimony, Clancy’s psychiatric treatment, fragmented care, collateral information, and the limits of ruling out bipolar disorder after a brief evaluation. Finally, we explore why the case has produced such intense public reactions and why psychiatry often requires tolerating uncertainty rather than forcing complex patients or cases into simple categories. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit psychofarm.substack.com