Jun 8, 2026 · 41 min · 10 segments
Professor **Robert Root-Bernstein** has not only made many scientific discoveries, but has also written extensively about the creative process, including in ***Sparks of Genius*** (with Michele…
No entities detected.
Robert Root-BernsteinGuest
Itay YanaiHost
Martin LercherHostNight Science Podcast HostHost
So Bob, can you give us a kind of opening statement about how you see the creative process in general and in science in particular?
I think I probably put more emphasis than most people on problem finding as the driver, that if you find the right problem, you define it in the right way, it actually tells you what tools you need.
It sets the criteria for what a solution's gonna look like, and in some ways, it actually creates an aesthetic, I guess.
I studied with Thomas Kuhn, who talked about paradigms, and when you have the right problem, it's either within the paradigm, so you know how to go about addressing it, or it's outside the paradigm, in which case you literally have to create a whole new way of looking at something and, and thinking about it and evaluating it.
And then the other lens is the tools for thinking, the idea that what people often call intuition-
If you look at the scientific literature, there's a number of people, Peter Medawar, Roald Hoffmann, some others who have written about the scientific paper being, in a sense, a lie.
You guys talk about it as being the, the day science that, that you s-set upon the process afterwards to convince-
So much of what you've had in your podcast is about that night science, where you just have these ideas in, I'm gonna call it a non-logical way.
It's not illogical, but it's non-logicalAnd the work that my wife and I did together for Sparks of Genius was trying to understand what are the elements that go into that intuition.
There are, you know, we can learn to observe better and find patterns better and make better analogies and things like that, but only if we practice and break it down and teach it that way.

You know, Bob, I've heard you say that, of course, if you knew how discoveries were systematically made, then you would make them more systematically.

So Bob, can you give us a kind of opening statement about how you see the creative process in general and in science in particular?
I think I probably put more emphasis than most people on problem finding as the driver, that if you find the right problem, you define it in the right way, it actually tells you what tools you need.
It sets the criteria for what a solution's gonna look like, and in some ways, it actually creates an aesthetic, I guess.
I studied with Thomas Kuhn, who talked about paradigms, and when you have the right problem, it's either within the paradigm, so you know how to go about addressing it, or it's outside the paradigm, in which case you literally have to create a whole new way of looking at something and, and thinking about it and evaluating it.
And then the other lens is the tools for thinking, the idea that what people often call intuition-
If you look at the scientific literature, there's a number of people, Peter Medawar, Roald Hoffmann, some others who have written about the scientific paper being, in a sense, a lie.
You guys talk about it as being the, the day science that, that you s-set upon the process afterwards to convince-
So much of what you've had in your podcast is about that night science, where you just have these ideas in, I'm gonna call it a non-logical way.
It's not illogical, but it's non-logicalAnd the work that my wife and I did together for Sparks of Genius was trying to understand what are the elements that go into that intuition.
There are, you know, we can learn to observe better and find patterns better and make better analogies and things like that, but only if we practice and break it down and teach it that way.

You know, Bob, I've heard you say that, of course, if you knew how discoveries were systematically made, then you would make them more systematically.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.