It’s All Your Fault: High Conflict People
Aug 13, 2026 · 45 min · 11 segments
In this classic episode from the archives, Bill and Megan sit down with retired Judge Bruce R. Cohen, who spent 24 years as a family law attorney and nearly 20 years on the bench in Arizona's Superior…
Bruce R. CohenGuestI've been in court two or three times, and I've got the biggest hearing or trial coming up now," or, "Meeting with family court services to get a, to explain my case about parenting," or some other decision-maker, a psychologist evaluating my case.
And what I learned over the years, 'cause I'm a mental health professional before becoming a family lawyer, is that it really helps to communicate simply And that clients should think about how they can boil their case down into three or four categories of information, and the most important examples of these three or four categories.
And often they're concerns about the other person's parenting, and also presenting their own parenting.
You may have 100 things you wanna say, but you have to narrow them down and really focus on like three or four key concerns, like undermining my parenting.
What are the examples of that? The judge isn't gonna wanna know that's your conclusion, they wanna know your examples of that.
So one day, um, he hit me, or one day she said to the kids, "You don't need your father anymore," or whatever it was.
Is that helpful to you? Is that unhelpful? Do you think that's a good idea? Maybe not a good idea?

When somebody is facing anticipative litigation, and, and even if they're well into the litigation, they could, uh, incorporate or employ this approach even if they haven't used it up till now.
I've been in court two or three times, and I've got the biggest hearing or trial coming up now," or, "Meeting with family court services to get a, to explain my case about parenting," or some other decision-maker, a psychologist evaluating my case.
And what I learned over the years, 'cause I'm a mental health professional before becoming a family lawyer, is that it really helps to communicate simply And that clients should think about how they can boil their case down into three or four categories of information, and the most important examples of these three or four categories.
And often they're concerns about the other person's parenting, and also presenting their own parenting.
You may have 100 things you wanna say, but you have to narrow them down and really focus on like three or four key concerns, like undermining my parenting.
What are the examples of that? The judge isn't gonna wanna know that's your conclusion, they wanna know your examples of that.
So one day, um, he hit me, or one day she said to the kids, "You don't need your father anymore," or whatever it was.
Is that helpful to you? Is that unhelpful? Do you think that's a good idea? Maybe not a good idea?

When somebody is facing anticipative litigation, and, and even if they're well into the litigation, they could, uh, incorporate or employ this approach even if they haven't used it up till now.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.