Flaawsome Talk with Kjersti Flaa
Oct 8, 2026 · 28 min · 10 segments
Blake Lively's new stunt is absurd || Head to https://Jonesroadbeauty.com and use code FLAA at checkout to get a FREE full sized Mascara on your first purchase.|| ➡ Watch my documentary Social Media…
Kjersti FlaaHost
It's been almost two years since they did the original hit piece based on Blake Lively's lawsuit with cherry-picked text messages taken out of context.
In this article, there are four other women that are also accusing the same team that Justin Baldoni used, according to the New York Times, to smear them.
They're saying that some people wanted to harm them and they hired this team to create smear websites against them and to spread false narratives.
In this article, they say Ms. Lively's legal efforts helped the other women who sued realize their campaigns were connected, they all told The Times.
That quote alone makes me believe that this is the work of Blake Lively's new publicist.
But what is clear to me after reading this article is that the main goal of it is to convince us that they were right about Blake Lively all along.
They were right in their reporting that there was a smear campaign against Blake Lively.
As you might remember if you followed this channel for a while, I was accused by the New York Times in their last hit piece of being part of a smear campaign against Blake Lively because I published an interview with Johnny Depp during his trial and he was represented by Melissa Nathan.
Therefore, when I published an interview I did with Blake Lively that wasn't showing her best side, I had to be a part of a coordinated smear campaign.
And it was insinuated very strongly that I was working with Melissa Nathan, whom at that point I had never heard of.
Right after that happened, somebody attacked my Wikipedia page and started changing up the information about me there.
making me look like an unreliable journalist with no integrity who's been who's been paid to swear Blake Lively.
Interestingly enough, that is one of the things that they mention in this article that these women have been victims of as well.
But anyways, all these women have different stories and they have different reasons to believe that someone wanted to harm them.
It's been almost two years since they did the original hit piece based on Blake Lively's lawsuit with cherry-picked text messages taken out of context.
In this article, there are four other women that are also accusing the same team that Justin Baldoni used, according to the New York Times, to smear them.
They're saying that some people wanted to harm them and they hired this team to create smear websites against them and to spread false narratives.
In this article, they say Ms. Lively's legal efforts helped the other women who sued realize their campaigns were connected, they all told The Times.
That quote alone makes me believe that this is the work of Blake Lively's new publicist.
But what is clear to me after reading this article is that the main goal of it is to convince us that they were right about Blake Lively all along.
They were right in their reporting that there was a smear campaign against Blake Lively.
As you might remember if you followed this channel for a while, I was accused by the New York Times in their last hit piece of being part of a smear campaign against Blake Lively because I published an interview with Johnny Depp during his trial and he was represented by Melissa Nathan.
Therefore, when I published an interview I did with Blake Lively that wasn't showing her best side, I had to be a part of a coordinated smear campaign.
And it was insinuated very strongly that I was working with Melissa Nathan, whom at that point I had never heard of.
Right after that happened, somebody attacked my Wikipedia page and started changing up the information about me there.
making me look like an unreliable journalist with no integrity who's been who's been paid to swear Blake Lively.
Interestingly enough, that is one of the things that they mention in this article that these women have been victims of as well.
But anyways, all these women have different stories and they have different reasons to believe that someone wanted to harm them.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
