POSTECOGLOU SACKED

So who fell out of their chair on Sunday morning when the news came through about Ange? Well, I was still awake.

I stayed up to watch the game.

Couldn't sleep? Well, I watched the game and I was just watching some of the post-match and I was texting a couple of people and then I saw he's been sacked and I'm like, oh, God.

So, you know, stayed up a little longer after that.

But are you

suggesting anyone was surprised? No one was surprised given what had been occurring.

You almost half expected it.

Especially 3-0.

You know, because the game, like almost all of Forrest's games while he was there, shouldn't have ended that way.

They should have scored at least one, maybe two, before Chelsea scored any.

They actually did well.

They did actually very well.

Yeah, but what does that matter?

Well, yeah, particularly against Chelsea.

And the idea, the absurdity of it, which we're going to dig into, but let's start from that point.

The absurdity that a Forrest coach should get sacked by losing against Chelsea...

I don't think they've won at home against them since 1997.

That kind of tells you a lot about the situation.

Oh, 100%.

Whenever you're defining should we keep the manager or not based on one game, particularly a hard game, is in and of itself insanity.

Exactly.

But I don't think it was defined by that one game.

We'll get into it right now.

Leading, leading, leading.

Of course it was.