Sep 16, 2026 · 21 min · 8 segments
Is the mighty US consumer reaching a breaking point? Host Justin Patrie sits down with CreditSights' James Goldstein and Fitch's Olu Sonola to unpack 'fragile stability,' value-seeking spending, the…
James GoldsteinGuest
Justin PatrieHostWinnie CisarHost
Now, a lot of what we've been talking about seems to fall under this term that has been discussed a lot, the K-shape in the U.S. economy, you know, from the very beginning in this conversation talking about divergences in income classes.

Do you think this term K-shape is appropriate? Is it overplayed? Do you include it in your own analysis?

I think there's some evidence to support it, but there's a lot of names that are saying we're seeing actually fairly stable kind of behavior based on income groups.

Our other analysts, you know, in the banking groups and the other groups, the banking, like just second quarter banking results, there was a lot of evidence against the K-shape.

They were saying, you know, a lot of large banks saying we saw similar performance and similarly good, decent performance across our income spectrum.

So even names, you know, obviously higher incomes are in a different trajectory, but there's kind of parallel trajectories between those higher income groups and lower income groups.

and that they didn't see any massive change in customer defaults or things like that relative to what they would typically be.

And there was a point in time kind of early in the year where the economy side of hotels were falling off.

You know, by second quarter again, all the names saying, oh, we're seeing sort of this parallel path and everyone's trying to invent new letters now, the E shape, the C shape, right? So the E shape, I guess the concept is everyone's, you know, there's different levels of spending performance, obviously, but everyone's kind of on a parallel path.

And that narrative has become more pervasive, I think, than kind of early 1Q when everyone was saying everything is K-shaped.

As I said, we can certainly point to retailers who have managed to kind of reassort the way that their business works.

So Walmart, without this kind of growth of higher income customers, yeah, you could say, okay, if those new customers didn't come into the channel, they would have underperformed most likely.

And that would kind of point to KHA, but that didn't happen, right? They found ways to grow and to attract new customers.

So it feels like the the narrative for the K-Shape specifically has weakened a little bit.
And the way I will analyze it is you have to look at spending, you have to look at income, you have to look at the balance sheet, particularly net worth.

Now, a lot of what we've been talking about seems to fall under this term that has been discussed a lot, the K-shape in the U.S. economy, you know, from the very beginning in this conversation talking about divergences in income classes.

Do you think this term K-shape is appropriate? Is it overplayed? Do you include it in your own analysis?

I think there's some evidence to support it, but there's a lot of names that are saying we're seeing actually fairly stable kind of behavior based on income groups.

Our other analysts, you know, in the banking groups and the other groups, the banking, like just second quarter banking results, there was a lot of evidence against the K-shape.

They were saying, you know, a lot of large banks saying we saw similar performance and similarly good, decent performance across our income spectrum.

So even names, you know, obviously higher incomes are in a different trajectory, but there's kind of parallel trajectories between those higher income groups and lower income groups.

and that they didn't see any massive change in customer defaults or things like that relative to what they would typically be.

And there was a point in time kind of early in the year where the economy side of hotels were falling off.

You know, by second quarter again, all the names saying, oh, we're seeing sort of this parallel path and everyone's trying to invent new letters now, the E shape, the C shape, right? So the E shape, I guess the concept is everyone's, you know, there's different levels of spending performance, obviously, but everyone's kind of on a parallel path.

And that narrative has become more pervasive, I think, than kind of early 1Q when everyone was saying everything is K-shaped.

As I said, we can certainly point to retailers who have managed to kind of reassort the way that their business works.

So Walmart, without this kind of growth of higher income customers, yeah, you could say, okay, if those new customers didn't come into the channel, they would have underperformed most likely.

And that would kind of point to KHA, but that didn't happen, right? They found ways to grow and to attract new customers.

So it feels like the the narrative for the K-Shape specifically has weakened a little bit.
And the way I will analyze it is you have to look at spending, you have to look at income, you have to look at the balance sheet, particularly net worth.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.