Do you think that that might be the interpretation of it?

I think that's a very reasonable interpretation.

Uh, when you have a three or a four-land hand, a big thing is that your range of draws expands a lot.

If you, if you're keeping a five-land hand, um, y- you're saying to yourself, "For the rest of the game, unless I have a substantial, uh, looting package or a way to use the extra land, something that I'm ramping towards, uh, any extra lands I draw for the rest of the game are going to be closer to dead draws." When you have a three-land hand, you're sort of happy to draw either a land or a creature or a spell, sort of anything.

Um, and so the primary v- reason that you'd want to mulligan a three-land hand is if either the spells in your hand aren't castable or you're stuck on one color.

And we have some numbers later about what proportion of your mulligans should be three or, um, four-land hands versus two and five.

But also, when I say should, the, the, that's a sort of loaded word because this is very, uh, a- as, as one of the complaints, uh, specified, this is very descriptive and not prescriptive.

So can you walk me through those?