But Mr. El-Khanafi, can you talk to me then about your perspective on this? If the US is in such a poor position to offer trust, what can the two sides then do together in such a short timeframe when a requirement is a final deal to actually get that level of trust required?

Well, the, the honest answer is not yet, but both sides have enough fear to keep talking, right? The, the MOU is a, is a ceasefire management tool as of now based on many observations and not really a trust-building exercise.

It's a fourteen-point framework that extends the ceasefire and sets perhaps the stage for the talks, uh, particularly the technical talks as we know of it today.

Um, Iran commits not to acquire a nuclear weapon, but no enforcement mechanism has yet been decided.

Now, these s- structural, uh, frameworks can be viewed through three structural trust problems that would stand out.

Firstly would be that Iran's hardliners, where we have to consider the internal diversities, are already undermining their own negotiators.

You've got Tasnim News Agency, aligned with the IRGC, have warned the Foreign Minister Araqchi, who is putting, uh, some efforts into these talks, against going to Switzerland empty-handed and said Iran had no obligation to keep the Strait of Hormuz open since, um, the MOU had been violated in Lebanon.

Zadan, what do you make of that suggestion?