Tom Inglesby
Epidemiologist
2
APPEARANCES
2
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
OCT 19
OCT 26
NOV 2
NOV 9
Oct 20, 2026
‘These risks are real’: the threat of AI bioweapons
4:00
4:06
4:14
4:25
4:33
4:43
10:57
Ian SampleHOST
What is the risk of AI at that sort of nation state level where they have a lot of capability already?

Tom InglesbyGUEST
No country really openly admits having a biological weapons programs, although there are intelligence reports that some countries do.

Tom InglesbyGUEST
The goal of creating something entirely new from scratch, that's going to remain quite a challenge because the AI models themselves have to train on existing data.

Tom InglesbyGUEST
And so at the moment, I think the greatest concern is innovations, changes to existing viruses or pathogens.

Tom InglesbyGUEST
but in ways that are somewhat unpredictable or outside the usual design space that humans would be working in or that nature has worked in before.

Tom InglesbyGUEST
I can give you an example that received a lot of attention this summer, which is a group of scientists, very talented scientists and engineers, Their goal was to use very powerful biological AI models to design novel bacteriophage viruses.
6 MINS LATER
Ian SampleHOST
Tom, in your view, what do we need to do? What do we need to bring in now to protect us as much as that's going to be possible?
Will AI Generate New Biological Threats?
2:33
2:40
2:58
10:36

Tom InglesbyGUEST
One was the report from Anthropic, the, one of the frontier model companies, that there had been...

Tom InglesbyGUEST
They presented five cases that had occurred in the last six months, I believe is the timeframe, of different entities trying to use their model to do things that they ultimately refused, Anthropic refused to honor, and that Anthropic itself thought were quite dangerous.

Tom InglesbyGUEST
I think some in the community wouldn't go all the way to say, and I think I-- it's not clear that those things were being-- those prompts were being used to make biological weapons, but what they were seeking was information that would create, in some cases, more dangerous pathogens than currently exist in nature or in laboratories, which could be used deliberately or even accidentally, even if they're doing this work for some purpose that was benign, if it got out of the lab, could cause potentially very serious problems.
7 MINS LATER
Josh SharfsteinHOST
First of all, what do you even mean by raising the ceiling of harm? What, what are we worried about here?