It means there must be a degree of uneasiness, let's call it that, right?

Definitely, definitely.

But as you recall, I had an incident in which much prior to the deployment of AI systems, an intelligence officer presented one factual picture before me, which was later proved wrong.

And Tal posed the question.

So in this case, who cares if he or she used AI or not?

The result

is still

And everyone at the table speaks in a set order.

An engineer that needs to verify the kinetic damage that can take place.

So, for example, if I will use this type of a bomb, how many buildings in the surrounding will be affected? Then...

A humanitarian officer that needs to bring in humanitarian considerations, for example, of sensible sites or of prior incidents that took place in the area.

So in

this regard, if I want to believe that Mahmoud had some connection to Hamas, it's because I want to believe in the system which I was a part of.

And at the end of the day, since I am not familiar with the specifics, it is a projection.

And I really, really, really want to believe that I was part of an operation that even if it was part of taking life, it did so in the most proper way possible.