Sue Biniaz
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
Aug 20, 2026
Climate’s coalition of the willing
0:50
0:59
1:09
1:19
1:28
1:37
S
0:45speaker_1NARRATOR
She outlines the US position and what the withdrawal means.

Sue BiniazGUEST
As a practical matter, the US has kind of been acting de facto like a non-party since the beginning of the second Trump administration.

Sue BiniazGUEST
They didn't send a delegation to COP30 or to the, even to the subsidiary body meetings in Bonn about a year ago.

Sue BiniazGUEST
They also stopped implementing their obligations under, uh, the agreements, including, you know, not submitting a report that was due about a year ago.

Sue BiniazGUEST
So already we're kind of living in the world of US non, uh, participation, which, you know, it's quite a contrast from the first Trump administration.

Sue BiniazGUEST
I, I would say broadly speaking, and just with respect to the COP, but multilateral climate cooperation in general, it's definitely had a negative effect.

Sue BiniazGUEST
I mean, climate has not even been a, uh, permissible topic at the G7 and the G20, for example.
8 MINS LATER
S
9:23speaker_1NARRATOR
Biniaz agrees and highlights that while the US has never been historically reliable on the climate, the current situation seems more serious.