We move forward.

Thank you, Your Honor.

As I stated before, we're going to split this up a little bit, the defense presentation, and kind of focus on three potential areas depending on the court's questions.

So if the court does have questions about the aggravator specifically, I would be the one to ask those questions too.

As I stated before, Mr. Burt is available to answer questions about the forensic evidence should the court have questions about that, and then Mr. Novak will answer comment upon Count 6-7 and the enhancement issues there at the end.

I want to start out by stating, Your Honor, that my focus is primarily on the legal framework and the constitutional issue that's been presented.

I will at times discuss the state's evidence, of course.

idea,