It's over.

No lawyer... who wants to keep their license, would allow their client to sit down and speak to a police officer without them being present at this point.

Whereas before, you may have been able to have some people go down with their parent It's over because it's not specific.

It's not even, for example, if that notice just went to Warren, maybe Warren's granddaddy.

I think you guys have had that conversation.

If not, we can go there.

Some of the adults, then we'd be in a different situation.

Can you tell us about it? Do you mind speaking about it?

Simone, what's your beat on this transgender ruling from the Supreme Court?

So, uh, one of the reasons that people thought, you know, that transgender people may have some protections were, was that they were hoping that perhaps the court would lean on, there was a 2020 case that specifically found by the United States Supreme Court that, uh, that discrimination based on transgender status is sex discrimination, which should be protected.

But here what the court did in order to say, "Well, hey, we're not, we're not running afoul of that ruling," what they're saying is the distinction here is biological sex, in that as it relates to sports, there's a distinction here, even though we are talking about children.

That's how they kind of wiggled their way around it.

Yeah, Symone.

Okay.

Yeah.

I, I've been reading, I've been looking down here, I've been actually reading, uh, Clarence Thomas's dissent and, and his opinions on here.

So then you said there's a statu- there's statute of limi- statute of limitations, but how long does this last? Uh, does it last, uh, uh, forever, because do they have qualified immunity, uh, when the- when Trump leaves office, is there a possibility? So w- what does any of this mean?

So generally, the statute of limitations is approximately five years.

That's why Trump wanted to work so hard to get those two back-to-back terms that would have protected him from the prior, um, charges that he had under the Bide- Biden administration.

Here, though, if currently, the Tr- Trump is working along with Bondi and others to commit any offenses, if he does not win a second term, or if a Republican administration doesn't win the next term, then charges can be brought against him.

See, the Supreme Court made a ruling, I think it was last year or the year before, about qualified immunity.

This doesn't cover it, 'cause this nasty stuff he did, he did prior to being president, as far as these documents go, and qualified immunity cannot be used to cover up your own crimes.

Do you agree, Simone?

100%.

Do you have a recipe, Symone Redwine?

So I actually have mastered the ability to cook in the microwave.

So everything that I...

Yes, so my favorite recipe is I go to Boston Market, okay, and they have the sweet potato casserole everybody loves.

I take it out of their pan, I put it in my own, put some marshmallows on the top of that bad boy, like half and half, okay? Zap that bad boy in the microwave so they, like, they, you know, they melt in the microwave or y- or you could put it in the oven if, if you like ovens.

And boom, people think you made it.

Now that's good.

... how you told the story about your sister, uh, Don.

I remain fearless in the face of these baseless charges as I continue fighting for New Yorkers every single day." None of these folks is backing down, Simone.

Not at all.

And Letitia James' case is in a really unique position where Lindsay Halligan better really worry about her bar license being shoved up her butt h- her bottom because with Letitia James' case, it was discovered that in that one, there were two different grand juries that were pulled together.

There was the one in Norfolk that did not indict, and that grand jury was the one that heard Letitia James' niece say, "I never paid any rent." She didn't make any money from this.

Yeah.

So if they represent to that grand jury and they do not present the fact that the niece said, "I didn't...

There was no rent." And not only that, the bar there is so low because this is not...

The argument isn't investment property, it's a second property where she only has to show that at least 15 days, 15 days across the entire year, she spent time at that home.

Take us inside the courtroom and this verdict, Simone.

So the courtroom today was very solemn.

It was filled with Diddy- Diddy's closest friends and relatives.

Of course his children were there.

They all spoke to the court in the, um, late afternoon, the late morning session.

And it was very solemn, and it was respectful in comparison to in the past, the defense team really was very colloquial.

They really wanted to- to be friendly both with the juror- jurors and with influencers in the audience.

So tell us.

Am I assessing this correct? What can we take from this?

That is correct.

So I think many people are surprised at this because Wendy and her camp, um, some months ago stated that...

It was back in March when, uh...

Wendy and her family, they, they called 911, they called the police, and she was taken to the hospital.

When that happened, her family and her team stated that she was given an exam for her mental health, et cetera, and that she passed, she passed with flying colors.

When that happened, on my channel...

Mm-hmm.

Simone, attorney, Simone Redwine.

Absolutely not.

Don, I happened to be in DC this weekend.

I was there on Saturday.

I was in the Navy Yard area.

I was literally, I was, I left an event and we're standing outside and we're chit-chatting with my friends.

All of a sudden we heard four gunshots, pop, pop, pop.

What do you think?

Okay.

The issue, the issue becomes did your boss then, did it become quid pro pro where you had to do certain things to keep your job or if your progression was, was suppressed if you didn't, you know, continue the relationship? Here one of the factual areas that I could see Tyler's team is gonna fight about is that it appears that throughout the years of this relationship, he continued to excel.

Um, and I could see that factually they could even argue that he was treated better than other cast members on the cast.

He got a raise when others did not receive a raise.

Um, Tyler then purchased the right to, uh, produce one of his, like a, a, a concept for a show.

Tyler purchased that and then part of the argument was that he purchased it, but that di- he didn't do anything with it.

Well, if no one else was out there trying to purchase it, that doesn't necessarily mean that he trying to suppress you.

Sorry.

The jury paid close attention as she described her pain, saying that when she tried to leave, she was threatened and manipulated.

Cassie was absolutely a compelling witness.

It was brilliant of the prosecution to have her lead the testimony.

And one of the most compelling things that she said on that stand was she read a text message after umpteen beatings from Puffy, and she said in that message, "I am not a ragdoll.

I am someone's child." And it was testimony like that where you could look over at the jury and you would see that they were captured by it.

While some amplified misinformation, others became trusted sources, translating the legal jargon and reaching audiences that traditional media often missed.

Viewers are able to get tidbits and, and, and little drama, courtroom drama, whether it's in the courtroom and out of the courtroom.

They're getting the tea as we call it, right? But that's what the people wanna know.

What say you at this point?

Yes.

When I heard the question yesterday about distribution, I said, "Oh, it's over.

Oh, it's over." Yesterday, when the jury asked if a friend asked me for substances and I give it to them, is that distribution? What I heard there is that some of the jurors are feeling like, wait a minute, that could be me.

Unin- inadvertently committing an underlying distribution offense.

And when that happens, you get, you can end up with jury nullifica- juror nullification, where a juror simply says, "I'm not gonna follow this, this rule in this way, 'cause it's too stupid.

This could be anybody." So when that happened yesterday, that also let me know they were not in agreement on RICO.

So...

But Simone, what say you?

Yes.

I say the prosecution has done an excellent job of proving the prostitution for transportation counts, for proving RICO, and then with the sex trafficking, that one, I could still see it going 50/50.

The reason for that is because Cassie's claims and Jane's claims are very different.

They have similarities, but Jane's claim, in my opinion, really weakened the trafficking case, because Jane's, uh, Jane's claims were based on fraud and based on, um, uh, there was only one incident of force.

So for the trafficking, I'm gonna...

My prediction is I would not be surprised if it was either a mistrial or if he got a not guilty.

... to me?

And did the- did the prosecution come back and did they refute that in any way? Are they doing a good job with presenting their case?

I mean, I feel like they're trying.

Part of the challenge is one thing they have not captured is the uniqueness of the music industry....

Capricorn Clark spoke to it, um, uh, multiple of the other witnesses, but they- the prosecution really needs to capture the fact that in the music industry, there's only like four or five companies you can work for.

So if you piss off Diddy, he could easily blackball you, and you just can't go work for another label.

They haven't delved into that, so I think it's gonna be difficult for the j- uh, jury to understand that when she's devastated about the job, she's very much devastated because she enjoys working in film, and that it would be almost difficult for her to get the same type of job elsewhere.

Um, so that was part of the challenge there.

Hmm.