They're mostly concerned about US and Europe and Asia.

I also kind of wanted to talk about how many companies I speak with assume that they're covered for IP risk under another policy, right? But in reality, traditional policies only go so far.

So for example, General liability policies, many people think because they see the words intellectual property in their CGL policy that they're covered for any IP risk, but it only covers a very narrow slice of intellectual property like money.

advertising-related issues, and very often, I think, exclusively exclude things like patents entirely.

Cyber insurance policy, a lot of clients will assume that they see a mention of IP in their cyber insurance, but that's just focused on data and privacy.

Cyber policies do not respond to IP disputes necessarily.

And even errors and omissions or, you know, coverage where it exists is usually quite limited when it comes to intellectual property.

And how involved do I stay in this process as somebody who pays the premium?