And it's crazy to have the opportunity as well to be working on that right now and that there is not that much people already even aware of the existence of So in my view, being $3 from par with Bitcoin down minus 50% to 60% is just showing the pure strength of the product and showing the perspective and potential growth of that asset category over the next years.

Yeah, I would add to that.

I mean, it's almost like if you think about high-yield bonds and junk bonds, when they emerged on the scene in the 70s and then kind of got some momentum in the 80s, it's kind of, I think, kind of similar with Bitcoin credit.

It's, again, not super well understood by the institutional investor class or even the retail investor class.

I think there are some institutions that are now getting involved that do understand the mispricing.

But if you think back to Braddock Hickman's original work on Fallen Angels, it's the name of the book, on high yield, which was published in, I think, the 1950s.

And this is the one that Michael Milken read that really inspired him to get into the high yield bond business.

Are there precedents that institutions have in mind or that you know that might be good precedents of analysis for that when it comes to monetary creation as well and this kind of elements?