Yes

... um, high quality knowledge and high quality understanding would have to do with, um, scientific method or, and/or peer review.

The idea being that, um, in order to get to that not false, [chuckles] you would make an observation, test it, form a hypothesis, conduct an experiment testing the hypothesis, analyze your data without bias to the greatest degree possible, and then draw a conclusion on whether you can reject the falsehood or not.

Um, and then with anything like that, with a true, um, experiment, you would wanna have peer review, meaning that experts in the field of whatever you're studying would review your methodology and your approach and the ways that you mitigate it by us and make sure that they're sound.

And if they're not sound, they would either, you know, have you edit them or just start over.

And that essentially, that's how science, um- ... reaches a place of high quality, we think, you know, of high quality knowledge.

Mm-hmm.

And that's, um, that's my, my angle and my perspective.