What do you actually go and do for them?

So, as I say, it all starts off really with a bit of a diagnostic.

It might be that a firm comes to me and says, you know, we've got a pipeline problem, we need more pipeline.

And that's very often the case, you know, as firms are growing, they think, that the way to getting more business is to have more pipelines.

So they'll say to marketing, we need more leads.

We need more of this, more campaigns, more, more, more.

And that's what a lot of companies do.

Do you see that there's going to be a move away from this kind of face to face, human to human approach? towards the AI driven or the AI created? Or do you think we might have a different future?

Explain why and what.

Yeah, I've never seen anything like this.

This is a situation here where, I mean, you just named two examples where in the Eric Adams case, where through the White House, they reached in to essentially strike a deal, according to the US attorney in New York, that if Adams was going to support the president's actions with respect to immigration, that they would dismiss the criminal case.

I mean, think about that.

You are trading a criminal prosecution for help in advancing your policy objectives.

I don't understand how we're not all breathless about that.

But the fact of the matter is, as these things are happening with such frequency, it's hard to stay in that constant state of outrage.

Do you worry that that norm has now been collapsed? Because Trump essentially treats the attorney general as his personal lawyer, right?

Uh, am I right? What do you think is going on here?

Yes.

Nationwide injunctions are nothing new.

Now, to be honest, presidents have always hated them, whether you're a Democratic president or a Republican, because they are used as an effort to rein in actions of the executive.

Um, but it, uh, nationwide injunctions also make sense.

If you think about this, if a court has determined that the action of the executive is unconstitutional or unlawful, which is what the courts, all three courts to have considered this matter did, it really doesn't make a whole lotta sense that it's only unconstitutional as to the particular litigants who brought this.

Um, so that's been sort of the basis for this.

They're trying to make a point that th- either post-Watergate, this executive branch has been shackled, and we are unshackling it.