
Roy Ruddle
Professor of Computing at the University of Leeds and Research Technology Director at the Leeds Institute for Data Analytics (LIDA), expert in data visualization and data quality and developer of the 6-step Data Quality Method.
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
Aug 23, 2026
Roy Ruddle and the 6 Step Data Quality Method
7:05
7:25
7:36
7:49
7:58
B
6:53BenHOST
the data has been collected in the first place?

Roy RuddleGUEST
If you think about why, why do you want to check data quality before you plunge into doing a modeling and analysis? Well, the first thing is, If there is anything wrong in the data, you want to find that out as soon as possible in case it would invalidate all your modeling.

Roy RuddleGUEST
In case you find out, oh, actually, I've got data for this, but I need to get different data for that.

Roy RuddleGUEST
Even if the data itself is, let's say, suitably correct and there isn't too much that's missing, you may have assumptions about the data.

Roy RuddleGUEST
And so another aspect of why you check data quality is to make sure that your assumptions about the data are the same as the data itself.

Roy RuddleGUEST
The what is then what are the checks that you do? And there are actually quite a lot of checks that you should consider doing.
B
12:04BenHOST
Is there a data quality failure story you can share with it without breaking NDAs or commercial agreements that genuinely surprised you where the data looked fine, but when you started looking more closely, you discovered it wasn't.