Without getting too technical, can you kind of walk us through how RealityCheck corrects the two different types of hallucinations that you brought up?

Oh, absolutely.

So I'll just try to explain it like in normal terms.

So imagine you have a brief, whether filed or not.

The first thing that happens is we are extracting every single case that you cite.

And then we're also linking to that what you say about the case.

So that could be a question.

What do you think, considering everything you've seen over the last five years and then some, as someone who gave legal writing instruction before there was AI, what is the proper use of AI in today's legal writing?