Mm-hmm.

And, and he was arguing for more transparency in legislation.

He was saying that the titles of bills should be clear and not too broad and, and amorphous, you know, too vague for people to understand what's in a bill, and that's exactly what, what he did when he drafted SEPA.

He made sure that everybody understood what the principles were that we were basing, uh, this position that Missouri was taking.

And, uh, you know, the...

You would think that would be what the courts would wanna see.

They would wanna see more transparency.

Yeah.

Let's get to this, uh, uh, Hanby versus the State.

Yeah, so it's...

Th- th- this particular lawsuit is, uh, styled two different ways.

It's Hanby v.

State, or actually the way the Supreme Court has it styled right now is the Article III Institute v.

State.

Uh, this is the first Article III Institute lawsuit that we've, in our little, little, uh, bevy of three we have going right now.

If you prevail, what happens then?