Reeves, what is your comfort level with open source AI and LLMs? Do you look at the cost equation versus security concerns as applied to specific uses?

It's an interesting question these days, right? We recently had some of the pacing debate come out of the leaders of the major LLM providers.

And, you know, it's largely those frontier model closed weight systems are... four, five months ahead of open weight models these days.

And some, you know, prognosticated that pacing was a measure to keep the competition at bay.

You know, I think ultimately these things have a, like they will seek their level, right? Any organization deploying this technology should really first be looking to bring it into a platform that then allows them to scale as appropriate with the right tool at the right time for the right job.

So, like, I know, like, we have a platform here at JLL we call Falcon.

And that's where we ensure that we are able to vet these various technologies and to bring them into a centralized toolkit, if you will, that is ring-fenced to our networks where the use of those LLMs is contained in the data that we use.

Can the same company be the builder, the accountable party and the one scaling adoption? Or does that have to eventually split apart?