What do you think is fundamentally different about cyber risk in twenty twenty-five compared to even two years ago? And are CROs keeping pace with that evolution?

Yeah, absolutely.

And it's funny that you mention thinking about the kind of changing methodology or how we've shifted the survey over the past couple of years.

I think something we saw in twenty twenty-three and twenty twenty-four is there's so many different flavors of cyber risk, and when we would engage with CROs on the topic, some would point to things around third party, some would point to your more traditional vulnerability management and aging technology.

Others would point to, you know, fraud, whether that's internal or from outside actors, nation-state actors.

So there's a lot of different flavors that we've seen.

As you mentioned, it still tops the list this year, but I think what we're seeing is that with the, the kind of evolving landscape of risks, we're seeing a lot more interconnectedness.

What does it mean to hire or develop for adaptability in the risk function? How do CROs assess for it?