
Rachel Whitlark
Associate Professor in the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech and Atlantic Council nonresident senior fellow, specializing in nuclear proliferation and foreign-policy decision-making.
2
APPEARANCES
2
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
Sep 16, 2026
Episode 9 | Thinking About the Second Nuclear Century
17:07
17:18
17:24
17:29
17:33
17:50

Larry RubinHOST
To interpret Austin in that way of what he meant by those comments, or even if you wanna just kind of take that and go with what, uh, he talked about when it goes to your thoughts on the second nuclear century.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
So, so first of all, let me, um, echo Austin and, and say it's a, it's a delight to be here with y'all today.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Um, and, uh, uh, really excited about the launch of the forthcoming second issue.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Really excited that that's gonna make its way into the universe very, very soon.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Um, Larry, since you've given me the choice, I think I'll, I'll sort of take w- my remarks in, in sort of two different directions and speak generally about how I'm thinking about the second nuclear age, and then also say what it means for how I've been thinking about and appreciating Austin's piece.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Um, so first, in terms of the second nuclear century, I mean, I think, I think the first thing to recognize is that there's a ton of nuance here, and it's not that the second nuclear age is totally different from the first one or that it is a carbon copy.
8 MINS LATER
N
25:37Nick GvosdevHOST
So what's your sense of, uh, of really someone saying, "Is the Cold War relevant, not relevant? Where is it relevant? Where is it not relevant?" And how does that feed into this whole concept of, uh, from the Cold War, again, of strategic stability, of managing these crises in a way that, you know, doesn't get you up Kahn's ladder of escalation until finally you're at rung 44, push the buttons, and we'll all go home?
Feedback Friday: Should the U.S. withdraw from the war in Iran, or can a deal be reached?
22:52
22:57
23:19
23:26
23:42

Rose ScottHOST
And we should note that the United States pulled out of that agreement in what, 2018, I believe? Yeah.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Critical event, um, in the first Trump administration where following the work that the Obama administration had done to secure the Iranian cooperation, um, which we should note required a variety of domestic and international sanctions, a ton of economic pressure to sort of coerce the Iranians to the negotiation table.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Um, the President Trump had campaigned on ripping up that deal, um, and then made good on it in 2018.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Um, and subsequent to the US withdrawal, over time the Iranians began ratcheting up their, uh, nuclear enrichment, which is one of the ways using uranium you can uh, uh, uh, build, um [smacks lips] material for either a civilian or a military program, nuclear program.

Rachel WhitlarkGUEST
Um, so facts on the ground changed between the Obama administration's negotiation of that deal and the, um, uh, Trump administration's withdrawal, and of course, the regional context has changed quite dramatically even closer to the present.
12 MINS LATER