Skip to main content
Peter Ticktin

Peter Ticktin

Attorney at law

Nov 6, 2026

37:16
And I guess you turned out to be right.
37:18
I'm sorry, I am.
37:21
Yeah, it's devastating to us what's going on right now.
37:24
This is what horror looks like because, you know, without the United States, the rest of the world can't sustain itself.
37:32
It's all going to fall off a cliff.
37:34
We are going to be in what Reagan referred to as a thousand years of darkness.
37:40
unless Donald Trump does what's necessary to do.

7 MINS LATER

44:26
Anybody can see that if you're not blind.
44:58
And I guess you turned out to be right.
45:01
I'm sorry, I am.
45:04
Yeah, it's devastating to us what's going on right now.
45:07
This is what horror looks like because, you know, without the United States, the rest of the world can't sustain itself.
45:15
It's all going to fall off a cliff.
45:17
We are going to be in what Reagan referred to as a thousand years of darkness.
45:23
unless Donald Trump does what's necessary to do.

7 MINS LATER

52:09
Anybody can see that if you're not blind.
37:04
All
37:04
right.
37:05
We don't know which is guessing, but I will tell you that the last scenario that I've given you here, the one that's the most dangerous, is also the most promising.
37:14
Okay, look, if it's scenario one, well, then it's a same-o, same-o.
37:19
How do we get the crooked judges, the judges that are committing insurrection, basically, sedition, actually treason, how do we bring them to justice? If we just have a simple win in both House and Senate, we're not bringing them to justice.
37:38
If we have losses, scenario number two, or possibility number two, then for sure we're not dealing with them.
37:46
But if we have possibility number three, where we lose, and there's enough senators to basically get Donald Trump out of office and put Hakeem Jeffries in instead— And that would be because they'd get rid of both Donald Trump and J.D. Vance at the same time.
39:06
Let's call it that.
35:50
You and I,
35:51
again, I don't know what's with you.
35:53
You know, you're turning into Peter Ticktin or I'm turning into Wayne Allyn Root.
35:58
That's a good thing.
35:59
It could be Trap Higgins Junior High School.
36:01
It could be.
36:05
But you and I are saying exactly the same thing, that this is what is happening around the world.

9 MINS LATER

45:12
How do we stop legally insurrection communist judges that are carrying out a coup at the judicial level?
25:04
Give me three minutes summation of where you think we're at now and what you can do for the people who find voter fraud with your legal expertise in your law firm.
25:13
OK, well, you know, the fact of the matter is, is we're living in extremely dangerous times right now.
25:19
Things that you've I've heard you say you're very cognizant of the fact that.
25:24
crazy things are going on.
25:26
And in terms of this election, we've heard different extremes.
25:30
Some people are predicting that the machines are not going to be in play and that the election is actually going to end up being fair.
25:37
And it goes to the extreme of the machines being so much in play that they switch enough senatorial votes or senators who then vote for removal of either Donald Trump or J.D. Vance or actually both of them together so that assuming Hakeem Jeffries gets to be the Speaker of the House, he would then end up being the next President of the United States.
26:46
People make this stuff up for clicks, right?
28:48
Peter, any thoughts on that?
28:50
Yes, because, you know, when you look at what other remedies we've got, there are none.
28:56
You know, when a candidate loses an election or when they're a candidate for the House of Representatives, then you can't take that to court.
29:08
There's no jurisdiction in the court.
29:09
The jurisdiction is in the House.
29:13
You've got to move the House to upset the results of that election, believe it or not.
29:20
The House regulates the House.

24 MINS LATER

Dan MontanoADVERTISER
53:45
Yeah,
24:10
Peter, any thoughts on that?
24:12
Yes, because when you look at what other remedies we've got, there are none.
24:19
When a candidate loses an election for when they're a candidate for the House of Representatives, then you can't take that to court.
24:30
There's no jurisdiction in the court.
24:31
The jurisdiction is in the House.
24:35
You've got to move the House to upset the the results of that election, believe it or not.
24:42
The House regulates the House.

25 MINS LATER

50:04
now.
36:32
Give me a three-minute summation of where you think we're at now and what you can do for the people who find voter fraud with your legal expertise and your law firm.
36:42
Okay.
36:43
Well, you know, the fact of the matter is we're living in extremely dangerous times right now.
36:49
The things that I've heard you say, you're very cognizant of the fact that crazy things are going on.
36:57
And in terms of this election, we've heard different extremes.
37:01
Some people are predicting that the machines are not going to be in play and that the election is actually going to end up being fair.
37:08
And it goes to the extreme of the machines being so much in play that they switch enough senatorial votes or senators who then vote for removal of either Donald Trump or J.D. Vance or actually both of them together so that assuming Hakeem Jeffries gets to be the Speaker of the House, he would then end up being the next president of the United States.
39:40
We're going to be
32:56
Peter, any thoughts on that?
32:58
yes because you know you when you look at what other remedies we've got there are none you know it when a candidate loses an election for when they're they're a candidate for the house of representatives then you can't take that to court there's no jurisdiction in the court the jurisdiction is in the house the vote you you've got to move the house to upset the results of that election, believe it or not.
33:28
The House regulates the House.
33:30
The Senate regulates the Senate.
33:33
So historically, when a candidate has brought a complaint to the House or to the Senate because they've been cheated, it's not as though they sit back and they look at the evidence and they decide according to what the evidence requires.
33:55
they always historically have gone with the majority rule.
34:00
So it's a matter of the votes.

24 MINS LATER

57:51
Incredible.
37:24
And these three voter fraud experts have the exact way that you can collect Did I say that accurately, do you think? Well, provided the Department of Justice follows
37:36
through.
37:38
Right.
37:38
Can I interrupt this whole discussion just to give you a little breaking news? Yeah, sure.
37:46
You know that Patrick Byrne has been sued by this fellow, Eric Coomer.
37:50
He's also sued by Dominion regarding the 2020 election and the fact that he had the movie, The Deep Rig.
37:58
Mm-hmm.
40:06
Look, close today by explaining the legal case that you're making, Peter, to be able to take action after the election.
42:49
Peter, last word.
42:52
Tina Peters was on CBC on 60 Minutes.
42:56
They used her.
42:57
They tried to do a hit piece on her.
42:58
I think she came across really well, but that's what the game was.
43:02
Not only that she appeared, but those who put her away also appeared.
43:08
And the reason that she was imprisoned, the main reason, was to be a warning to all of the clerks in the United States, which is this.
45:06
Yeah,
6:15
If people cheat this time, they're not going to get away with it.
6:19
Peter Tickton, your thoughts.
6:22
Yeah, this is exactly the point.
6:24
You know, I mean, there's a reason for the fact that this was developed by by Rick Richards.
6:29
It's not the doctor.
6:31
Of course, he and I are the the geniuses here.
6:34
This is Rick Richards, who's the genius to put this together.
10:10
Where do people get you, sir?
29:43
Great service.
29:44
War Room.
29:45
Here's your host, Stephen K.

20 MINS LATER

49:23
But given the fact that you guys see this, can't we go to main justice right now and say, Hey guys, uh, here's the data, here's the analysis, and take it off the campaign shoulders and actually give it to the Justice Department, sir?
49:37
We've advised the Justice Department, and they're very interested.
49:40
Also, each, Jerry and I have advised the president of the fact that we have this, you know, the way I'm looking at it is this, okay, there's either going to be, the machines are either going to be in play this time, which case they could take whatever seats they want, We've got 22 Republican senators up for reelection.
50:01
Well, two of them are for election because they were recently appointed.
50:05
But basically, 22 are up for election.
44:48
non-american citizens on your rolls and we will prosecute criminally prosecuted if you count them they're in court they're in appellate court yesterday state of california could care less is it possible for you and dr corsi i understand every state runs its own thing and every secretary of state uh runs their own deal but given the fact that you guys see this can't we go to main justice right now and say hey guys uh here's the data, here's the analysis, and take it off the campaign shoulders and actually give it to the Justice Department, sir?
45:20
We've advised the Justice Department, and they're very interested.
45:23
Also, each, Jerry and I have advised the president of the fact that we have this.
45:32
You know, the way I'm looking at it is this, okay, there's either going to be, the machines are either going to be in play this time, in which case they can take whatever seats they want.
45:41
We've got 22 Republican senators up for reelection.
45:44
Well, two of them are for election because they were recently appointed.
45:48
But basically, 22 are up for election.

9 MINS LATER

55:14
If people cheat this time, they're not going to get away with it.
32:30
Will it have anything to do with this election? Tell me how it has anything to do with this election.
32:35
So, what I'm picturing is that you're exactly right.
32:39
It's too late for this to change the conduct of the election.
32:44
But I'm looking at it more from the point of view of somebody that you know is a bank robber.
32:49
And, you know, you're the police, and you know this guy's robbed a whole bunch of banks.
32:55
and you need him to rob one more because now you're watching and you know how to catch him.
33:00
If you're running for the Senate or for the House and your election, there's something wrong with the election and you want to challenge it, It's not the courts.
34:02
Do you honestly believe, Peter, that the Senate, the cowards that they are and the bribed, rhinos that they are, you really believe they would vote to unseat a senator who won an election based on information from Ellie? I don't believe it for a second.
7:18
Will it have anything to do with this election? Tell me how it has anything to do with this election.
7:23
So what I'm picturing is is that you're exactly right.
7:26
It's not it's too late for this to change the conduct of the election.
7:31
But I'm looking at it more from the point of view of somebody that, you know, is a bank robber.
7:37
And, you know, you're you're you're the police and you know, this guy's robbed a whole bunch of banks.
7:42
and you need him to rob one more because now you're watching and you know how to catch him.
7:47
If you're running for the Senate or for the House and your election, there's something wrong with the election and you want to challenge it, It's not the courts.
8:49
Do you honestly believe, Peter, that the Senate, the cowards that they are and the bribed, rhinos that they are, you really believe they would vote to unseat a senator who won an election based on information from Ellie? I don't believe it for a second.
24:46
So team evil has some really smart people on it.
24:49
Yeah.
24:51
We have some smart people too, but I've been working with Jerome Corsi lately and I've been working and we've been working together with, with Rick Richards.
25:00
And Rick Richards is one of these geniuses.
25:04
So is Corsi to some extent.
25:06
And so a number of the people we've been working with.
25:12
But it wasn't Corsi or Tickton that came up with this program.

10 MINS LATER

34:50
it's
48:34
No, I...
48:35
I got that, but it's the machines.
48:37
The machines are the only thing that's going to be able to steal this election.
48:40
Otherwise, you're going to see it's going to be too big to rig.
48:44
Okay, it's the machines.
48:46
That's what we need to be wary about.
48:48
And we don't know what the arrest of Maduro has done, and we don't know all these answers.

8 MINS LATER

56:33
What makes anyone think that federal judges with a robe, unelected, are not going to stop everything Trump tries to do to overturn another stolen election?
35:13
Me too.
35:14
Uh, and, you know, $25 million isn't gonna touch what the real problem may be, which i- is or what's orchestrated by the machines.
35:23
And, you know, for many months I've been talk- may- maybe a year or so, I've been talking about the, the, the nightmare scenario, which is that, uh, th- that we not only lose the House and the Senate, but we lose the Senate by en- enough senators that they're gonna be able ...
35:40
You know, there are gonna be some that we're gonna discover that are compromised.
35:43
They're just dirtbags.

18 MINS LATER

53:59
Right.
53:59
So, and the whole world's gonna go down.
54:01
So, you know, what w- so the, the one thing that I'm telling you, Donald Trump's the one guy in the world, in all of history, who was the President of the United States who relinquished power because of an election that he knew was rigged.
37:14
Right.
37:15
Yeah, they take parties.
37:18
So, you know, and then if you take it and you compare it, and this is really what's so good about what he did, he compares it all to the records of the property appraisers in each county.
37:31
so that he can, when he says it's inappropriate or there's something wrong with it, first of all, let me also explain that.
37:38
Fraud is telling a lie, knowing that it's false, with the intention the person you're saying it to will rely on it.
37:47
THAT PERSON DOES RELY ON IT TO HIS DETRIMENT.
37:50
THOSE ARE THE ELEMENTS OF FRAUD.
42:29
They could only make it
43:07
Amazing.
43:08
Yeah, they take parties.
43:11
So, you know, and then if you take it and you compare it, and this is really what's so good about what he did, he compares it all to the records of the property appraisers in each county.
43:25
so that he can, when he says it's inappropriate or there's something wrong with it, first of all, let me also explain that.
43:31
Fraud is telling a lie, knowing that it's false, with the intention the person you're saying it to will rely on it.
43:40
that person does rely on it to his detriment.
43:44
Those are the elements of fraud.
46:18
It may not be fraud, but it's cheating.
72:29
all right i love it i love it i appreciate it uh get me some bullet points because i'd like to send it to president trump and make sure he knows it exists out there and i'd like to send it to some republican candidates i know here in the state of nevada to make sure they know it exists send me the bullet points i know exactly what to say so i'm saying the right thing and passing on the right information appreciate both you being on uh dr rick richards thank you for all you've done uh let's get peter ticked on and see what he has to say peter do you think any democrat in a big city is going to ever want what dr rick richards is offering
73:03
well you know we've got a senator in pennsylvania there's there's the odd one here and there that uh that i think are actually honest and decent
73:11
federman you mean federman yeah
73:13
yeah yeah but but meanwhile you know but i wanted to explain this a little bit differently okay because i have a little bit of a different way of explaining what dr uh richards has done here First of all, you've got to give this man credit on a lot of levels.
73:29
He's a genius to begin with.
73:31
Yes, agreed.
73:32
His other conscience and life prove it, but this helps on top of that.
73:36
He's a dedicated patriot.
43:53
Peter? Yeah.
43:56
Well, I don't think I can be heard.
43:57
Can I be heard? Yes, we hear you.
43:59
All right.
44:00
OK, this is working.
44:01
All right.
44:02
So let me let me.

7 MINS LATER

51:04
Is all of this leading up to some sort of a case we're making for President Trump to jump in and do an October surprise and declare a national security emergency or some part of it or something like it? Tell me what's in store or give me a hint.
19:34
And that that information then leads back to um the ability to manipulate that data at every level but why six years later peter are we still having this conversation and why is it that they're able to gaslight us when we can see very clearly what the outcome is and the outcome is is that the american people are nothing but slaves
19:53
okay first of all four of those years where the biden administration And so that leaves us with two years.
20:04
So why in the world didn't we get a better handle on this in the last two years? Well, you know, there's been, there's other things that, well, it's Murphy's Law, so they can't go wrong as well.
20:16
And the selection of certain people were perhaps not the best people to have put in different positions, but there's redundancy here.
20:24
And even with Kurt Olson stepping aside, and even, you know, I still have hope that there's things that are happening I have reason to have hope that there's things that are better happening that will spare us from becoming the nightmare.
20:38
You know, I think some people are calling it the nightmare scenario now because it's been discussed.
20:46
Because most people weren't thinking about the removal of both the president and the vice president at the same time.

5 MINS LATER

26:05
Because we have to be able to rid ourselves of this craziness.
60:46
What has Trump just done?
60:49
Okay.
60:49
All right.
60:49
Well, let me just finish that quick thought, okay, which is let's just say 10% of me was against Donald Trump.
60:56
Who is it for then? There's nobody that's decent that it's for.
61:00
It's for the cabal.
61:02
It's for China.

35 MINS LATER

96:09
When you say martial law after the election, what would that look like?

Scroll for more appearances

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.