P
Paul Sukha
Paul Socka is a criminal defence lawyer at Embry Dann LLP in Toronto and former Supreme Court of Canada judicial law clerk who argued R. v. Chemlal before the SCC (heard as "Paul Sukha" in the hearing audio).
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
Oct 9, 2026
His Majesty the King v. Abdel Karim Chemlal (41766)
S
142:17speaker_0NARRATOR
Robert Delorme.
15 MINS LATER
S
157:46speaker_0NARRATOR
Paul Sukha.
P
157:55Paul SukhaGUEST
As a warrantless search of individuals who are not necessarily arrested or detained, safety searches are exceptional police powers.
P
158:05Paul SukhaGUEST
In this context, the Criminal Lawyers Association encourages the court to affirm the reasonable grounds to believe standard, but I'm gonna focus my submissions today on the issue of uncertainty that has come up and confusion that's been discussed throughout the hearing, and ask the court to take the opportunity to set clear standards to guide the conduct of these exceptional circumstance- of these exceptional searches as it has done in cases such as Golden, Saeed, and Fearon.
P
158:36Paul SukhaGUEST
The first guideline that we suggest, which has been discussed, is that a safety search is only permitted where there is an imminent threat to safety, and this has been touched on including by the Attorney General of Ontario.
P
158:51Paul SukhaGUEST
And we agree that this must be connected to the Waterfield standard and the question of whether or not a safety search is reasonably necessary in the circumstances.