Would it not be better for him to have been prosecuted by the Ugandan government as opposed to in The Hague?

Well, there's a lot in that now.

And I'll try and break it up into two broad answers, maybe.

The first being the charge that the ICC is maybe not culturally equipped to deal with the context or understand it.

I would strongly reject that proposition.

You know, all of Ongwen's circumstances... what happened to him, all of that was, you know, factored into the trial.

You know, Ong Wen's defence team called numerous witnesses in support of all of these issues, you know, cultural, you know, witnesses who spoke to cultural issues, traditional justice, his own personal circumstances, which generally would inform mitigation, you know.

And also I note the Akoli religious leaders, Pishinist that wanted the traditional makeup of local religious leaders that wanted to put him through Matua but opposed, I believe, the ICC proceedings, right?