So do you agree with everything that Mr. Clement said about how this regulatory scheme operates? And e- even putting aside the preemption question, is everything he said your understanding of, uh, w- how the agency works?

I agree with him.

I would just add two refinements.

One, he is correct that EPA doesn't go after people for, in a hypothetical world, if things change, um, would you have been in trouble for not changing your label even though EPA doesn't let you? That's right.

We don't bring that kind of enforcement action.

But two, not only was Mr. Clement correct in talking about cancellation proceedings, if new evidence does come to EPA's attention, and again, we don't think this is a new information case because of the time periods involved, even if it were, what EPA normally does...

Let's say EPA, it came to EPA's attention, we think this product might cause cancer.

I'm sorry, I misspoke on the-