So could you just summarize those for us shortly?

Yeah, you know, we often say that this is technology that's dangerous when it doesn't work and dangerous when it does.

What I mean by that is that this is an algorithmic technology, basically a variant of AI, that's making a best guess about whether an input image might be a match to images in a database.

But it often gets it wrong.

And when it gets it wrong, we've seen it turn people's lives inside out over and over.

We now know of at least 15 publicly known cases of wrongful arrest in states across the country after police relied on incorrect results from this technology.

This technology also has been shown in audit testing over and over to get it wrong more often with darker-skinned people, so people of color and Black people, which can accentuate biases in policing.

Number two is, what about finding a balance between law enforcement and the goals of keeping the public safe and protecting society? Can we find that balance?

If you could talk about what this ruling means and explain what a habeas petition is.

Yeah, a habeas petition is one of the oldest forms of legal process we have.

It dates from the 1200s in England as a way to... to give judges the power to release people from unjust or unconstitutional or illegal detention.

Immediately after Mosen was seized by immigration agents last year, his legal team filed a writ of habeas corpus in federal court.

And within just a couple weeks, a federal judge looked at the case and ordered him released, saying that there was strong reason to believe that this detention was in violation of his First Amendment rights.

That's critical, because otherwise what the government wants... is to be able to hold people, non-citizens, in immigration detention facilities for months or years while the very slow immigration court process plays out.

To silence people by putting them behind bars just because the Secretary of State or some other high-level official doesn't like what they say.

Your thoughts on this?

If you could talk about what this ruling means and explain what a habeas petition is.

Yeah, a habeas petition is one of the oldest forms of legal process we have.

It dates from the 1200s in England as a way to... to give judges the power to release people from unjust or unconstitutional or illegal detention.

Immediately after Mosen was seized by immigration agents last year, his legal team filed a writ of habeas corpus in federal court.

And within just a couple weeks, a federal judge looked at the case and ordered him released, saying that there was strong reason to believe that this detention was in violation of his First Amendment rights.

That's critical, because otherwise what the government wants... is to be able to hold people, non-citizens, in immigration detention facilities for months or years while the very slow immigration court process plays out.

To silence people by putting them behind bars just because the Secretary of State or some other high-level official doesn't like what they say.

Your thoughts on this?