How could societies make these rights meaningful in practice?

Well, I believe shelter, access to clean water and food, education, healthcare, freedom of expression, freedom of movement and stable, free internet connections should be established as basic human rights.

And we will have mainly have three main sources of funding.

We'll abolish mother cases.

We will abolish nation states.

So this is one source of funds.

We will also abolish military industrial conferences as we will not need to fight one another and spend trillions of dollars to protect ourselves from each other.

What problem are you trying to address and how will you respond to concerns about investments, innovations, and implementations?

the polished conversation?

Well, I believe the AI DUP or AI Debates for Months publications can have a revolutionary impact within publishing, education, policymaking, humanities, and social sciences.

So within publishing, it changes the relationship between the author and the readers.

Instead of presenting readers with a thesis of mine or a theory of mine, I present them with this main idea and a set of arguments and counter-arguments surrounding it.

So it makes the reading process more interesting and it helps the reader form their opinions in a better way.

Within education, I believe students can be assigned to submit AI DUP sessions at the end of each assignment before handling debates with their colleagues accordingly.

And this may help enhance their critical thinking.

Why do you believe that kind of global structure is necessary?

What problem do you believe a global government could solve that our current system of separate nation cannot?

We have three main problems in today's world and in the near future.

We have, uh, climate change, we have, uh, potentially recurring pandemics and, and we have billionaires' greed.

Billionaires' greed is, uh, represents through the idea of AI taking over our jobs.

Wars spread all over the world due to billionaires' greed and, uh, uh, many other sub-issues such as child labor, extreme wealth inequality, and stuff like that.

So, uh, these three main issues, climate change, uh, potentially recurring pandemics and billionaires' greed, they don't respect borders, neither should we.

So where do you think this problem actually begin? Is it in our institution, education, political system, or does it begin more earlier with the way individual learn to think?

The main problem has to do with our w- the, the way we consume information and the way we teach our kids to consume information, and then with the whole socialization process.

of the exchange.

So basically you have a piece of content, whether it's an essay, a book, video, audio, or anything.

You feed it into an AI tool and ask the AI tool to criticize it.

Then you engage in back and forth argumentation with the tool and publish the entire unanswered transcript within 24 hours of the exchange.

This may have a revolutionary input within publishing, education, policymaking, humanities, and social science.

Within publishing, it may change the relationship between authors and readers.

Instead of presenting them with polished conclusions and asking them to accept or reject them blindly.

So across everything you've written and explored, what is one idea you believe people must understand about your work?

Now, can you share with us, how did you come about this particular idea for citizen assemblies? Did you have an experience, or how did you come about this?

Well, I was thinking of an alternative to the currently corrupt representative democracies spread all over the world because these representatives are bought by billionaires all over the world.

So I believe people should have the right to vote on each individual issue.

So when you think of a problem like this, AI taking over our jobs, this has to do with billionaires seeking extra money by replacing human beings and bringing over some AI tools.

So when you think of that problem, we can share the benefits of technology instead of letting them benefit alone.

We can all share the benefits of technology by reducing working hours And this way people will have the time and energy to practice enlightened populism across issues, investigate for the truth, and come up with better decisions.

No system shall be 100% accurate, and no one will have 100% of the truth on all issues, whatever may happen in the future.

What problem are you trying to solve with such a policy? And what would you say to critics who believe that it should discourage innovation and entrepreneurship?

Why do you believe a single global government is necessary?

Because of the problems we're facing today and in the future.

We are facing problems such as climate change, a global issue.

potentially recurring pandemics, and billionaire's breed.

Billionaire's breed is represented in AI taking over our jobs, represented in wars all over the world through military-industrial complexes, represented in extreme wealth inequality, stuff like that.

So these three main issues, climate change, potentially recurring pandemics, and billionaire's breed can be effectively resolved through a global government.

Billionaires, we can tax billionaires out of existence by setting a wealth cap at $999 million per person all over the world.

How would your proposed system prevent one person, one political group, or one institution from gaining too much power.

Mohamed, before we continue, can you tell us a little bit more about yourself?

Well, I graduated, I have a bachelor's degree in mass communication, so I formally studied a bit of politics, philosophy and economics, macroeconomics.

After graduation and within the years of college, I worked as a freelance marketing consultant and I started writing books in 2017.

I started developing my own philosophical framework ever since.

I have some experience as an activist.

I was one of the founders of the Harass the Harassers campaign.

We used to catch those committing sexual harassment and spray on their backs, I'm a harasser, to send a message to the overall community that sexual harassment shouldn't be acceptable by society.

Do you think humanity's greatest challenge today is technological, political, or philosophical?

So, can information change? overload or being exposed to a lot of information affects our mental

well-being? I believe the more information, the better.

As human beings, we can process information quite efficiently.

But the main issue here is how to handle information, misinformation and disinformation all together.

in the same pot.

So you have when you're dealing with social media, for instance, it relies on your historical data of interactions within the platform.

So it ends up creating a status of confirmation bias.

So how does critical thinking help us avoid making emotional decisions that could negatively impact affect our lives

In today's society, how can someone become a more enlightened thinker?

Well, it has to do with economic aspects and sociological aspects.

These are covered across three books of mine, that mine's free, humanity's money, and truth is sexy.

So...

I'll just focus on the media part of the question for now.

It has to do with how people interact with the abundance of information we're living in today.

So I believe people should use a pull strategy instead of a push strategy.

What experiences or observations led you toward these ideas? And what problems do you believe they could solve?

So, Mohamed, for listening and hearing about your work for the first time, what is ADOP, A-I-D-O-P, and what inspired you to create it?

Well, A-I-D-O-P or ADOP stands for AI Debates on One's Publications.

It involves a content creator prompting an AI tool to criticize their own content on publishing the entire unedited transcript of back and forth argumentation within 24 hours of the exchange.

So the idea goes like this.

You have the original content, piece of content, whether it's a book, a video or an article or whatever.

And then you feed it into an AI tool and ask it to provide criticism.

And then you start getting into back and forth argumentation accordingly and publish the entire and edited transcript within 24 hours of the exchange.

What does an enlightening populist look like in practice and how can people develop that mindset?

oh wow wow amazing amazing response muhammad so now you know um do you believe ai has the potential to improve education and critical thinking or could it make people more into intellectually dependent

AI is just a tool.

It doesn't do anything on its own.

It depends on how you use it.

So in case of education, there is a panic in the educational systems all over the world because due to the rise of LLMs and AI tools, people... people think students are getting more reliant on these tools, relying on these tools to create assignments on their behalf and stuff like that.

So this can be easily solved if tutors can assign the students to submit an AIDUP session at the end of each assignment and handle debates with their colleagues accordingly.

As for critical thinking, it depends on how you use it.

So my question is, what motivates that idea and how do you respond to those who argue it could discourage innovation?