Michael, what do you see as the biggest changes to the way the companies are thinking about playbooks here and the fact that the original source could be a multitude of different locations, some of which you may have easy access to and others not so easy? What do you see the big changes here as far as playbooks go?

Yeah, I mean, I think, you know, regarding e-discovery playbooks and what e-discovery teams need to do, both with the advent of AI just generally and then also with their adoption of AI tools is, you know, the same as with any tool or with any new channel, right? If you want to, you know, we know that AI is discoverable.

We know that AI is producible in some instances.

So e-discovery teams need to be aware of where those AI prompts, where those AI outputs are being stored.

They need to be aware of whether or not those prompts and outputs and that storage location are currently being stored indefinitely or if there's, you know, disposition turned on.

Because if disposition is turned on, you need to be able to stop it.

You need to be able to place a legal hold if it's, you know, determined to be relevant to some active matter.

What additional guidance can we expect, if any, from the U.S. regulators?

That's a tough one, Robert.

As new technology comes out and as AI continues to develop and evolve, you know, the regulators will provide guidance as they deem necessary.

It'll be interesting to see with this new advent of watermarking in AI outputs, whether the FINRA or other regulators want to provide additional guidance.

Firms sort of have to predict and expect and sort of have to sit and wait for guidance to come out.

There's nothing that is on its way.

Michael, what do you see the biggest changes that are happening here on these questions because of agentic, where it's system interacting with system, sometimes autonomously, sometimes without proper authorization or identification of who they are and what they should have access to? How are firms wrestling with this new dimension?

Yeah.